Player Stats

Korey Robertson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,743
Receptions
127
Touchdowns
18

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss0-00-
2015 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss614200343.8
2016 PostseasonSouthern Miss13549055.1
2016 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss1332388355.1
2017 PostseasonSouthern Miss13436189.3
2017 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss13721,0701189.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Southern Miss paired 1,106 primary output with 86.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 86.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Rice

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Southern Miss

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

85.1

Efficiency

86.3

Usage

31.5

Consistency

70.8

Best Game by takeover score

Rice

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 36. Kentucky: 111. Southern: 26. UL Monroe: 72. North Texas: 82. UTSA: 45. UTEP: 52. Louisiana Tech: 127. UAB: 65. Tennessee: 122. Rice: 159. Charlotte: 91. Marshall: 118

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 4 by 60. Kentucky: 7 by 100. Southern: 3 by 57.8. UL Monroe: 3 by 100. North Texas: 8 by 68.3. UTSA: 2 by 100. UTEP: 5 by 69.3. Louisiana Tech: 9 by 94.1. UAB: 6 by 72.2. Tennessee: 8 by 100. Rice: 8 by 100. Charlotte: 6 by 100. Marshall: 7 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins86.3 · Games = 8 · +3.0 vs Losses
Losses83.2 · Games = 5 · -3.0 vs Wins