Player Dossier

2014-2017

Southern Miss

Cornell Armstrong

DB • 5'11" • 180 lbs • Bassfield, MS, USA

Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile

Cornell Armstrong shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.7 disruption score.

Usage Score

7.4

Efficiency

23.7

Consistency

53.9

Season Value

28.6

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · UTSA

14141516161717

Snapshot

Career Teams
2
Seasons Tracked
7
Program Path
UTSA • Southern Miss
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Cornell Armstrong, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · UTSA. Cornell Armstrong shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 23.7 disruption score.

Cornell Armstrong played DB for UTSA and Southern Miss. Across 4 tracked seasons, Cornell Armstrong recorded 41 rushing yards, 69 tackles, and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Southern Miss.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season

UTSA paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 23.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across UTSA, Southern Miss.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: North Texas

Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Southern Miss

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

1.4

Efficiency

23.7

Usage

7.4

Consistency

53.9

Best Game by takeover score

Florida State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida State: 2. Kentucky: 0. Unknown: 1. UL Monroe: 1. North Texas: 2.5. UTSA: 1. UTEP: 1. Louisiana Tech: 2. Charlotte: 2. Marshall: 1

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida State: 3 by 32.5. Kentucky: 2 by 8.3. Unknown: 0 by 10. UL Monroe: 3 by 22.5. North Texas: 3 by 37.5. UTSA: 1 by 14.2. Louisiana Tech: 4 by 36.7. Charlotte: 1 by 24.2. Marshall: 5 by 30.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.3 · Games = 6 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 3 · +0.2 vs Wins
First Half1.3 · Games = 5 · -0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half1.4 · Games = 5 · +0.1 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

10 games

Featured metric

Havoc Plays

Top game by takeover score

North Texas

Best efficiency game

37.5 vs North Texas

Result
Wed 12/27@ Florida StateL 13-4231101
Sat 11/25@ MarshallW 28-2753100
Sat 11/18vs CharlotteW 66-2111101
Sat 10/21@ Louisiana TechW 34-2744101
Sat 10/14vs UTEPW 24-01
Sat 10/7@ UTSAW 31-2910001
Sat 9/30vs North TexasL 28-43320.5002
Sat 9/16@ UL MonroeW 28-1732001
Sat 9/9vs Unknown000010
Sat 9/2vs KentuckyL 17-2421000

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    UTSA

    2014

    Opening stop

  2. 2

    Southern Miss

    2014-2017

    Final stop

Season Progression

2014201420152016201620172017
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2014 Regular SeasonUTSA00
2014 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss000
2015 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss2202
2016 PostseasonSouthern Miss1022.84.58
2016 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss1022.84.50
2017 PostseasonSouthern Miss13.523.77.43.5
2017 Regular SeasonSouthern Miss13.523.77.40

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Charlotte

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

1

Primary metric

1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.

#2

North Texas

1

Primary metric

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.

#3

Louisiana Tech

2

Primary metric

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.3 takeover score.

#4

North Texas

2.5

Primary metric

Loss with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 47 takeover score.

#5

Florida State

2

Primary metric

Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 46.5 takeover score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2014 Regular Season · UTSA

0 primary output · 0 efficiency · usage

50

#2

2014 Regular Season · Southern Miss

50

0 primary · 0 efficiency · usage

#3

2015 Regular Season · Southern Miss

41.4

2 primary · 20 efficiency · usage

Milestones

2

Impact games

0

Splash games

0

10+ tackle games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2014 · Rating 0.8159

Bassfield · Bassfield, MS

Committed To
Southern Miss
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2014

Career Facts

2

Career teams

7

Seasons tracked

69

Career Tackles

Data Context

Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.