Player Stats

Chris James College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
1,138
Rushing yards
1,031
Receiving yards
107
Touchdowns
5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2012 Regular SeasonPittsburgh00000-
2013 Regular SeasonPittsburgh00000-
2014 PostseasonPittsburgh1233330056.4
2014 Regular SeasonPittsburgh1242740423456.4
2015 Regular SeasonPittsburgh1030125348043.6
2016 Regular SeasonWisconsin00000-
2017 PostseasonWisconsin910100040.6
2017 Regular SeasonWisconsin925922336140.6
2018 PostseasonWisconsin626260038.8
2018 Regular SeasonWisconsin682820038.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2014 Postseason

Pittsburgh paired 460 primary output with 50 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 48.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Pittsburgh, Wisconsin.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico

Win with 29 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Wisconsin

Games

6

Scrimmage Yards / G

18

Efficiency

48.4

Usage

6

Consistency

66.2

Best Game by takeover score

New Mexico

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Miami: 26. Western Kentucky: 10. New Mexico: 29. Illinois: 11. Rutgers: 14. Purdue: 18

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 5 by 54.2. Western Kentucky: 2 by 52.1. New Mexico: 6 by 50.3. Illinois: 3 by 38.2. Rutgers: 3 by 48.6. Purdue: 4 by 46.9

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

First Half21.7 · Games = 3 · +7.3 vs Second Half
Second Half14.3 · Games = 3 · -7.3 vs First Half