Player Stats

Adonis Jennings College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
1,417
Receptions
89
Touchdowns
13

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonPittsburgh5655033
2015 Regular SeasonTemple714146239.8
2016 PostseasonTemple117154260.1
2016 Regular SeasonTemple1120320260.1
2017 PostseasonTemple13351076.9
2017 Regular SeasonTemple1339691776.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Temple paired 742 primary output with 88.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 88.2 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Multi-stop career journey

Production spans 2 team stops, with role shifts visible across Pittsburgh, Temple.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Navy

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Temple

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

57.1

Efficiency

88.2

Usage

16.6

Consistency

63.9

Best Game by takeover score

Navy

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Florida International: 51. Notre Dame: 30. Villanova: 75. Massachusetts: 41. South Florida: 33. Houston: 41. East Carolina: 37. UConn: 52. Army: 62. Navy: 127. Cincinnati: 16. UCF: 88. Tulsa: 89

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Florida International: 3 by 100. Notre Dame: 2 by 100. Villanova: 3 by 100. Massachusetts: 3 by 91.1. South Florida: 2 by 100. Houston: 4 by 68.3. East Carolina: 3 by 82.2. UConn: 5 by 69.3. Army: 4 by 100. Navy: 5 by 100. Cincinnati: 3 by 35.6. UCF: 2 by 100. Tulsa: 3 by 100

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins62.3 · Games = 7 · +11.3 vs Losses
Losses51 · Games = 6 · -11.3 vs Wins