Usage Score
9.1
Player Dossier
2014-2016App State
WR • 5'10" • Monroe, NC, USA
Jaylan Barbour reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
9.1
Efficiency
44.2
Consistency
35.6
Season Value
39.2
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · App State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jaylan Barbour, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · App State. Jaylan Barbour reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
App State paired 40 primary output with 100 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 44.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2016 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Akron
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
5
Receiving Yards / G
9
Efficiency
44.2
Usage
9.1
Consistency
35.6
Best Game by takeover score
UL Monroe
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 2. Miami: 0. Akron: 28. Texas State: 9. UL Monroe: 6
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 1 by 13.3. Akron: 2 by 93.3. Texas State: 2 by 30. UL Monroe: 1 by 40
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
5 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Akron
Best efficiency game
93.3 vs Akron
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
App State
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | App State | 40 | 100 | 11.8 | — |
| 2015 Postseason | App State | 49 | 80 | 7.9 | 9 |
| 2015 Regular Season | App State | 49 | 80 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | App State | 45 | 44.2 | 9.1 | -4 |
#1 Featured game
Michigan
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
40
Primary metric
40 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UL Monroe
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Akron
28
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
28 receiving yards with a 93.3 efficiency score.
#4
Unknown
11
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
11 receiving yards with a 73.3 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio
10
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
10 receiving yards with a 66.7 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · App State
40 primary output · 100 efficiency · 11.8 usage
68.1
#2
2015 Postseason · App State
55.4
49 primary · 80 efficiency · 7.9 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · App State
55.4
49 primary · 80 efficiency · 7.9 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8531
Monroe · Monroe, NC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
134
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 10 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jaylan Barbour quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit