Usage Score
26.1
Player Dossier
2014-2018Old Dominion
Jonathan Duhart
WR • 6'3" • 220 lbs • Midlothian, VA, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Jonathan Duhart reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
80
Consistency
76.4
Season Value
70.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Old Dominion
141516161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Old Dominion
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jonathan Duhart, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season · Old Dominion. Jonathan Duhart reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Regular Season
Old Dominion paired 1,045 primary output with 80 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
target-driven usage with 80 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Charlotte
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 83.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Old Dominion
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
87.1
Efficiency
80
Usage
26.1
Consistency
76.4
Best Game by takeover score
Rice
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Liberty: 83. Florida International: 150. Charlotte: 127. Virginia Tech: 142. East Carolina: 104. Florida Atlantic: 100. Marshall: 31. Western Kentucky: 74. Middle Tennessee: 36. North Texas: 80. Unknown: 23. Rice: 95
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Liberty: 7 by 79. Florida International: 3 by 100. Charlotte: 7 by 100. Virginia Tech: 9 by 100. East Carolina: 8 by 86.7. Florida Atlantic: 8 by 83.3. Marshall: 5 by 41.3. Western Kentucky: 5 by 98.7. Middle Tennessee: 6 by 40. North Texas: 6 by 88.9. Unknown: 3 by 51.1. Rice: 7 by 90.5
Split Comparison
Wins98.7 · n=3 · +7.9 vs Losses
Losses90.8 · n=8 · -7.9 vs Wins
First Half117.7 · n=6 · +61.2 vs Second Half
Second Half56.5 · n=6 · -61.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Charlotte
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/24 | @ Rice | L 13-27 | — | 7 | 95 | 13.6 | 13.60 | 0 | 30 |
| Sat 11/17 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 23 | 7.7 | 7.70 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs North Texas | W 34-31 | — | 6 | 80 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 36 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Middle Tennessee | L 17-51 | — | 6 | 36 | 6 | 6 | 1 | 7 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Western Kentucky | W 37-34 | — | 5 | 74 | 14.8 | 14.80 | 0 | 19 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Marshall | L 20-42 | — | 5 | 31 | 6.2 | 6.20 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Florida Atlantic100 receiving yards · High volume | L 33-52 | — | 8 | 100 | 12.5 | 12.50 | 0 | 31 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ East Carolina100 receiving yards · High volume | L 35-37 | — | 8 | 104 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 24 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Virginia Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | W 49-35 | — | 9 | 142 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 3 | 29 |
| Thu 9/13 | @ Charlotte100 receiving yards | L 25-28 | — | 7 | 127 | 18.1 | 18.10 | 1 | 35 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Florida International100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | L 20-28 | — | 3 | 150 | 50 | 50 | 2 | 83 |
| Sat 9/1 | @ Liberty | L 10-52 | — | 7 | 83 | 11.9 | 11.90 | 0 | 18 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Old Dominion
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Old Dominion | 127 | 86.1 | 5.6 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Old Dominion | 636 | 77.3 | 19 | 509 |
| 2016 Postseason | Old Dominion | 735 | 80.4 | 22.1 | 99 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Old Dominion | 735 | 80.4 | 22.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Old Dominion | 121 | 90 | 21.6 | -614 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Old Dominion | 1,045 | 80 | 26.1 | 924 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
155
Primary metric
155 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
UTSA
160
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
160 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
97
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
97 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Charlotte
127
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
127 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Virginia Tech
142
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Regular Season · Old Dominion
1,045 primary output · 80 efficiency · 26.1 usage
70.3
#2
2016 Postseason · Old Dominion
58.1
735 primary · 80.4 efficiency · 22.1 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Old Dominion
58.1
735 primary · 80.4 efficiency · 22.1 usage
Milestones
8
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
7
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
2★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.7711
Manchester · Midlothian, VA
- Committed To
- Old Dominion
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,664
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 45 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.