Usage Score
25.1
Player Dossier
2014-2017Miami
WR • 5'9" • 186 lbs • Raleigh, NC, USA
Braxton Berrios reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage Score
25.1
Efficiency
78.1
Consistency
71.7
Season Value
68.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Miami
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Braxton Berrios, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Miami. Braxton Berrios reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Braxton Berrios played WR for Miami. Across 4 tracked seasons, Braxton Berrios recorded 17 passing yards, 81 rushing yards, and 1,166 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Miami.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Miami paired 670 primary output with 78.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 78.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Toledo
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
51.5
Efficiency
78.1
Usage
25.1
Consistency
71.7
Best Game by takeover score
Wisconsin
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 45. Unknown: 35. Toledo: 105. Duke: 52. Florida State: 90. Georgia Tech: 44. Syracuse: 11. North Carolina: 78. Virginia Tech: 50. Notre Dame: 10. Virginia: 38. Pittsburgh: 61. Clemson: 51
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 3 by 100. Unknown: 3 by 77.8. Toledo: 5 by 100. Duke: 2 by 100. Florida State: 8 by 75. Georgia Tech: 6 by 48.9. Syracuse: 1 by 73.3. North Carolina: 7 by 74.3. Virginia Tech: 3 by 100. Notre Dame: 2 by 33.3. Virginia: 3 by 84.4. Pittsburgh: 4 by 100. Clemson: 7 by 48.6
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Toledo
Best efficiency game
100 vs Wisconsin
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/31 | vs Wisconsin | L 24-34 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 21 |
| Sun 12/3 | @ Clemson | L 3-38 | — | 7 | 51 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 21 |
| Fri 11/24 | @ Pittsburgh | L 14-24 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 39 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Virginia | W 44-28 | — | 3 | 38 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 24 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs Notre Dame | W 41-8 | — | 2 | 10 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 7 |
| Sun 11/5 | vs Virginia Tech | W 28-10 | — | 3 | 50 | 14.8 | 16.70 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ North Carolina | W 24-19 | — | 7 | 78 | 11.1 | 11.10 | 1 | 42 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Syracuse | W 27-19 | — | 1 | 11 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Georgia Tech | W 25-24 | — | 6 | 44 | 7.3 | 7.30 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/7 | @ Florida StateHigh volume · 2+ TD | W 24-20 | — | 8 | 90 | 11.3 | 11.30 | 2 | 21 |
| Fri 9/29 | @ Duke | W 31-6 | — | 2 | 52 | 26 | 26 | 1 | 27 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Toledo100 receiving yards | W 52-30 | — | 5 | 105 | 21 | 21 | 1 | 55 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs Unknown | — | — | 3 | 35 | 11.7 | 11.70 | 1 | 22 |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Miami
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Miami | 232 | 67.6 | 11.3 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Miami | 232 | 67.6 | 11.3 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Miami | 86 | 42.8 | 7.4 | -146 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Miami | 86 | 42.8 | 7.4 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Miami | 178 | 72.1 | 7.3 | 92 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Miami | 178 | 72.1 | 7.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Miami | 670 | 78.1 | 25.1 | 492 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Miami | 670 | 78.1 | 25.1 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
Toledo
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105
Primary metric
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
West Virginia
64
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
64 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Unknown
63
Primary metric
Game with an explosive receiving profile.
63 receiving yards with a 70 efficiency score.
#4
Florida State
90
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
90 receiving yards with a 75 efficiency score.
#5
North Carolina
78
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
78 receiving yards with a 74.3 efficiency score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Miami
670 primary output · 78.1 efficiency · 25.1 usage
68.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · Miami
68.7
670 primary · 78.1 efficiency · 25.1 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Miami
38.8
232 primary · 67.6 efficiency · 11.3 usage
1
100+ receiving yards
1
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8843
Leesville Road · Raleigh, NC
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,166
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.