Player Stats

Mike Smith College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
73
TFL
8.5
Sacks
1.5

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonMiami00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonMiami00-0--0-
2016 Regular SeasonMiami5110.50--015.9
2017 PostseasonMiami102-0--08
2017 Regular SeasonMiami10190.50--08
2018 PostseasonMiami9101.51.5--053.7
2018 Regular SeasonMiami93160--053.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Miami paired 9 primary output with 29 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 29 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Wisconsin

Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Miami

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

1

Efficiency

29

Usage

6.5

Consistency

31.5

Best Game by takeover score

Wisconsin

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Wisconsin: 3. LSU: 0.5. Savannah St: 0. Toledo: 1. Florida International: 0.5. North Carolina: 2.5. Florida State: 1. Duke: 0.5. Virginia Tech: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Wisconsin: 10 by 71.7. LSU: 3 by 17.5. Savannah St: 1 by 4.2. Toledo: 6 by 35. Florida International: 4 by 21.7. North Carolina: 4 by 41.7. Florida State: 3 by 22.5. Duke: 5 by 25.8. Virginia Tech: 5 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 6 · -0.5 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · Games = 3 · +0.5 vs Wins