Player Stats

Joseph Yearby College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,575
Rushing yards
2,119
Receiving yards
456
Touchdowns
17

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2014 PostseasonMiami1227207047.2
2014 Regular SeasonMiami12600489111247.2
2015 PostseasonMiami1363630078.4
2015 Regular SeasonMiami131,212939273878.4
2016 PostseasonMiami1316160050.6
2016 Regular SeasonMiami1365759265750.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason

Miami paired 1,275 primary output with 53.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2016 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 55.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Florida Atlantic

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2016 Postseason · Miami

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

51.8

Efficiency

55.3

Usage

16.4

Consistency

47.3

Best Game by takeover score

Florida Atlantic

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. West Virginia: 16. Florida A&M: 119. Florida Atlantic: 142. App State: 36. Georgia Tech: 78. Florida State: 39. North Carolina: 78. Virginia Tech: 59. Notre Dame: 8. Pittsburgh: 28. Virginia: 53. NC State: 15. Duke: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. West Virginia: 3 by 55.6. Florida A&M: 8 by 100. Florida Atlantic: 23 by 63.5. App State: 9 by 40.1. Georgia Tech: 10 by 77.6. Florida State: 10 by 40.6. North Carolina: 13 by 71.3. Virginia Tech: 9 by 68.3. Notre Dame: 7 by 5.8. Pittsburgh: 8 by 36.5. Virginia: 9 by 61.3. NC State: 2 by 78.1. Duke: 1 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins54.3 · Games = 9 · +8.3 vs Losses
Losses46 · Games = 4 · -8.3 vs Wins