Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
North Texas paired 35.5 primary output with 47.7 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Tackles | TFL | Sacks | QB Hur | PD | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2015 Regular Season | North Texas | 0 | 0 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | - |
| 2016 Postseason | North Texas | 11 | 4 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 34.2 |
| 2016 Regular Season | North Texas | 11 | 46 | 6 | 3.5 | 2 | - | 0 | 34.2 |
| 2017 Postseason | North Texas | 14 | 3 | - | 0 | - | - | 0 | 48.1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | North Texas | 14 | 65 | 6.5 | 2 | 7 | 3 | 0 | 48.1 |
| 2018 Postseason | North Texas | 13 | 5 | 1 | 0 | - | - | 0 | 80.4 |
| 2018 Regular Season | North Texas | 13 | 61 | 17 | 6.5 | 9 | 2 | 0 | 80.4 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
North Texas paired 35.5 primary output with 47.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 47.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Liberty
Win with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
2.7
Efficiency
47.7
Usage
13.8
Consistency
73.9
Best Game by takeover score
Liberty
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Utah State: 1. SMU: 3. Incarnate Word: 3. Arkansas: 4. Liberty: 6. Louisiana Tech: 2.5. UTEP: 0.5. Southern Miss: 2. UAB: 3. Rice: 3. Old Dominion: 2. Florida Atlantic: 2.5. UTSA: 3
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Utah State: 5 by 30.8. SMU: 6 by 55. Incarnate Word: 7 by 59.2. Arkansas: 4 by 56.7. Liberty: 5 by 70.8. Louisiana Tech: 7 by 54.2. UTEP: 4 by 21.7. Southern Miss: 3 by 32.5. UAB: 5 by 50.8. Rice: 4 by 46.7. Old Dominion: 9 by 57.5. Florida Atlantic: 4 by 41.7. UTSA: 3 by 42.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.