Player Stats

Jeffery Wilson College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
3,732
Rushing yards
3,205
Receiving yards
527
Touchdowns
34

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonNorth Texas926522441230.7
2015 Regular SeasonNorth Texas1090183071170.6
2016 PostseasonNorth Texas111278146275.7
2016 Regular SeasonNorth Texas111,0568552011375.7
2017 Regular SeasonNorth Texas111,3831,2151681680.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season

North Texas paired 1,383 primary output with 62.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Regular Season role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 62.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: UAB

Win driven by a workhorse rushing load. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Regular Season · North Texas

Games

11

Scrimmage Yards / G

125.7

Efficiency

62.9

Usage

32.8

Consistency

64.7

Best Game by takeover score

UAB

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Lamar: 180. SMU: 46. Iowa: 112. UAB: 218. Southern Miss: 166. UTSA: 83. Florida Atlantic: 82. Old Dominion: 36. Louisiana Tech: 181. UTEP: 202. Army: 77

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Lamar: 13 by 100. SMU: 17 by 28.6. Iowa: 16 by 78.6. UAB: 27 by 83.6. Southern Miss: 31 by 53.1. UTSA: 16 by 54. Florida Atlantic: 14 by 52.2. Old Dominion: 9 by 41.7. Louisiana Tech: 22 by 84.3. UTEP: 27 by 76.2. Army: 20 by 39.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins142.9 · Games = 8 · +62.9 vs Losses
Losses80 · Games = 3 · -62.9 vs Wins