Usage Score
13.7
Player Dossier
2014-2017Florida State
Ryan Izzo
TE • 6'5" • 245 lbs • Highland Lakes, NJ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Ryan Izzo reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.4
Consistency
70.1
Season Value
67.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Florida State
141515161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Florida State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Ryan Izzo, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Florida State. Ryan Izzo reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Ryan Izzo played TE for Florida State. Across 4 tracked seasons, Ryan Izzo recorded 761 receiving yards, 1 tackles, and 6 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Florida State.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Florida State paired 317 primary output with 85.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Clemson
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Florida State
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
35.2
Efficiency
85.4
Usage
13.7
Consistency
70.1
Best Game by takeover score
Southern Miss
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Southern Miss: 59. Alabama: 46. Miami: 54. Duke: 13. Louisville: 37. Boston College: 14. Syracuse: 5. Clemson: 60. Florida: 29
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Southern Miss: 6 by 65.6. Alabama: 3 by 100. Miami: 4 by 90. Duke: 1 by 86.7. Louisville: 2 by 100. Boston College: 1 by 93.3. Syracuse: 1 by 33.3. Clemson: 1 by 100. Florida: 1 by 100
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins26.5 · Games = 4 · -15.7 vs Losses
Losses42.2 · Games = 5 · +15.7 vs Wins
First Half41.8 · Games = 5 · +14.8 vs Second Half
Second Half27 · Games = 4 · -14.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Clemson
Best efficiency game
100 vs Florida
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Wed 12/27 | vs Southern Miss | W 42-13 | — | 6 | 59 | 9.8 | 9.80 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Florida | W 38-22 | — | 1 | 29 | 29 | 29 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Clemson | L 14-31 | — | 1 | 60 | 60 | 60 | 1 | 60 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Syracuse | W 27-24 | — | 1 | 5 | 5 | 5 | 0 | 5 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Boston College | L 3-35 | — | 1 | 14 | 14 | 14 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Louisville | L 28-31 | — | 2 | 37 | 18.5 | 18.50 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Duke | W 17-10 | — | 1 | 13 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 13 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Miami | L 20-24 | — | 4 | 54 | 13.5 | 13.50 | 1 | 16 |
| Sun 9/3 | @ Alabama | L 7-24 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 24 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Florida State
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152015201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Florida State | 7 | 46.7 | 4.3 | — |
| 2015 Postseason | Florida State | 210 | 79.6 | 7.6 | 203 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Florida State | 210 | 79.6 | 7.6 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Florida State | 227 | 67.3 | 9.4 | 17 |
| 2017 Postseason | Florida State | 317 | 85.4 | 13.7 | 90 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Florida State | 317 | 85.4 | 13.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Carolina
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
63
Primary metric
63 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Florida
36
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
36 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Clemson
60
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
60 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Miami
37
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
37 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Miami
54
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
54 receiving yards with a 90 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Florida State
317 primary output · 85.4 efficiency · 13.7 usage
67.3
#2
2017 Regular Season · Florida State
67.3
317 primary · 85.4 efficiency · 13.7 usage
#3
2015 Postseason · Florida State
58.7
210 primary · 79.6 efficiency · 7.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8909
Carrollton · Carrollton, GA
- Committed To
- NC State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
761
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 29 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.