Usage Score
5
Player Dossier
2014-2017Utah
DB • 5'11" • 187 lbs • North Las Vegas, NV, USA
Casey Hughes shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16.6 disruption score.
Usage Score
5
Efficiency
16.6
Consistency
10
Season Value
11.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Utah
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Casey Hughes, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Utah. Casey Hughes shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 16.6 disruption score.
Casey Hughes played DB for Utah. Across 4 tracked seasons, Casey Hughes recorded 34 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Utah.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Utah paired 0 primary output with 5.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 16.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2017 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: BYU
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
16.6
Usage
5
Consistency
10
Best Game by takeover score
Colorado
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. BYU: 3. San José State: 0. Arizona: 1. Stanford: 0. USC: 0. Arizona State: 0. Oregon: 0. UCLA: 0.5. Colorado: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. BYU: 1 by 34.2. San José State: 3 by 12.5. Arizona: 6 by 35. Stanford: 4 by 16.7. USC: 3 by 12.5. Arizona State: 2 by 8.3. Oregon: 1 by 4.2. UCLA: 6 by 30. Colorado: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
BYU
Best efficiency game
35 vs Arizona
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/26 | vs Colorado | W 34-13 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs UCLA | W 48-17 | 6 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Oregon | L 20-41 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Arizona State | L 10-30 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/15 | @ USC | L 27-28 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/8 | vs Stanford | L 20-23 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Arizona | W 30-24 | 6 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | vs San José State | W 54-16 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ BYU | W 19-13 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Utah
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Utah | 0 | 5.2 | 1 | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Utah | 0 | 5.2 | 1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Utah | 4.5 | 16.6 | 5 | 4.5 |
#1 Featured game
BYU
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.7 takeover score.
#2
Arizona
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 26.2 takeover score.
#3
UCLA
0.5
Primary metric
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 18.5 takeover score.
#4
Stanford
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 6.6 takeover score.
#5
USC
0
Primary metric
Loss with 0 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0 disruption/tackle impact with 5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Utah
0 primary output · 5.2 efficiency · 1 usage
35.4
#2
2016 Regular Season · Utah
35.4
0 primary · 5.2 efficiency · 1 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Utah
11.6
4.5 primary · 16.6 efficiency · 5 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8136
Legacy · North Las Vegas, NV
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
34
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.