Usage Score
6.9
Player Dossier
2014-2018Clemson
Kendall Joseph
LB • 6'0" • 225 lbs • Belton, SC, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Kendall Joseph shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
32.1
Consistency
10.3
Season Value
15
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Clemson
1415161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Clemson
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Auburn
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Kendall Joseph, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Clemson. Kendall Joseph shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Clemson paired 17 primary output with 41.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Louisville
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Clemson
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
32.1
Usage
6.9
Consistency
10.3
Best Game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Notre Dame: 0. Unknown: 0. Texas A&M: 3. Georgia Southern: 0. Syracuse: 0. Wake Forest: 0. NC State: 1. Florida State: 0. Louisville: 3.5. Boston College: 2.5. Duke: 0. South Carolina: 0. Pittsburgh: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Notre Dame: 3 by 12.5. Unknown: 2 by 8.3. Texas A&M: 6 by 55. Georgia Southern: 4 by 16.7. Syracuse: 12 by 50. Wake Forest: 6 by 25. NC State: 7 by 39.2. Florida State: 4 by 16.7. Louisville: 10 by 76.7. Boston College: 7 by 54.2. Duke: 7 by 29.2. South Carolina: 6 by 25. Pittsburgh: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins0.8 · n=12
First Half0.6 · n=7 · -0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · n=6 · +0.4 vs First Half
All Games0.8 · n=13
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Louisville
Best efficiency game
76.7 vs Louisville
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/29 | vs Notre Dame | W 30-3 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/2 | @ Pittsburgh | W 42-10 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/25 | vs South Carolina | W 56-35 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Duke | W 35-6 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/11 | @ Boston College | W 27-7 | 7 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Louisville10+ tackles · Splash game | W 77-16 | 10 | 4 | — | 2 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Florida State | W 59-10 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | vs NC State | W 41-7 | 7 | 4 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | @ Wake Forest | W 63-3 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Syracuse10+ tackles | W 27-23 | 12 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Georgia Southern | W 38-7 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Texas A&M | W 28-26 | 6 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Clemson
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Clemson | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Clemson | 17 | 41.1 | 10.4 | 17 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Clemson | 17 | 41.1 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Clemson | 7.5 | 39.6 | 8.6 | -9.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Clemson | 7.5 | 39.6 | 8.6 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Clemson | 10 | 32.1 | 6.9 | 2.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Clemson | 10 | 32.1 | 6.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Auburn
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 66.7 takeover score.
#2
Louisville
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 65.3 takeover score.
#3
Wake Forest
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.6 takeover score.
#4
Virginia Tech
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 57.4 takeover score.
#5
Troy
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Clemson
17 primary output · 41.1 efficiency · 10.4 usage
29.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · Clemson
29.2
17 primary · 41.1 efficiency · 10.4 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Clemson
27.4
7.5 primary · 39.6 efficiency · 8.6 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
4
Splash games
10
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8642
Belton-Honea Path · Honea Path, SC
- Committed To
- Clemson
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
279
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 40 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.