Player Stats

Isaac Yiadom College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
79
TFL
3
Passes defended
17

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonBoston College00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonBoston College10-0--042.8
2016 PostseasonBoston College12310-2043.3
2016 Regular SeasonBoston College122310-8043.3
2017 PostseasonBoston College132-0--038.8
2017 Regular SeasonBoston College135110-7038.8

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Boston College paired 12 primary output with 19 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 24.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Clemson

Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Boston College

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

0.8

Efficiency

24.7

Usage

4.1

Consistency

12.8

Best Game by takeover score

Clemson

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Iowa: 0. Northern Illinois: 0. Wake Forest: 0. Notre Dame: 0. Clemson: 4. Central Michigan: 1. Virginia Tech: 2. Louisville: 0. Virginia: 2. Florida State: 1. NC State: 0. UConn: 0. Syracuse: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Iowa: 2 by 8.3. Northern Illinois: 6 by 25. Wake Forest: 4 by 16.7. Notre Dame: 4 by 16.7. Clemson: 8 by 73.3. Central Michigan: 5 by 30.8. Virginia Tech: 5 by 40.8. Louisville: 1 by 4.2. Virginia: 3 by 32.5. Florida State: 2 by 18.3. NC State: 5 by 20.8. UConn: 4 by 16.7. Syracuse: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.6 · Games = 7 · -0.4 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 6 · +0.4 vs Wins