Player Stats

Justin Hollins College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
164
TFL
32
Sacks
13
QB hurries
11
Passes defended
8
Touchdowns
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonOregon00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonOregon00-0--0-
2016 Regular SeasonOregon12519.5332061.9
2017 PostseasonOregon13511--057.7
2017 Regular SeasonOregon135392.53-257.7
2018 PostseasonOregon1172.51.5--077.4
2018 Regular SeasonOregon114810556077.4

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Oregon paired 31 primary output with 48.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 48.1 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: San José State

Win with 5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 90.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Oregon

Games

11

Havoc Plays / G

2.8

Efficiency

48.1

Usage

13.4

Consistency

61.4

Best Game by takeover score

San José State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

1234567891011

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Michigan State: 4. Bowling Green: 4.5. Portland State: 3. San José State: 5. Stanford: 4. California: 0.5. Washington: 2. Washington State: 0. Arizona: 2. UCLA: 6. Arizona State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Michigan State: 7 by 69.2. Bowling Green: 7 by 74.2. Portland State: 2 by 38.3. San José State: 8 by 83.3. Stanford: 5 by 60.8. California: 4 by 21.7. Washington: 8 by 53.3. Washington State: 3 by 12.5. Arizona: 3 by 32.5. UCLA: 3 by 62.5. Arizona State: 5 by 20.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins3.1 · Games = 8 · +1.1 vs Losses
Losses2 · Games = 3 · -1.1 vs Wins