Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 1,549 primary output with 94 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 12 | 2 | 33 | 1 | 49.3 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 12 | 26 | 423 | 5 | 49.3 |
| 2015 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 13 | 1 | 10 | 0 | 65.2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 13 | 52 | 1,077 | 10 | 65.2 |
| 2016 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 13 | 9 | 171 | 1 | 78.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 13 | 62 | 1,209 | 9 | 78.5 |
| 2017 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 13 | 5 | 126 | 1 | 87.2 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 13 | 69 | 1,423 | 13 | 87.2 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 1,549 primary output with 94 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
119.2
Efficiency
94
Usage
23.1
Consistency
77.8
Best Game by takeover score
Baylor
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 126. Tulsa: 145. South Alabama: 98. Pittsburgh: 124. TCU: 153. Texas Tech: 127. Baylor: 235. Texas: 32. West Virginia: 91. Oklahoma: 128. Iowa State: 25. Kansas State: 159. Kansas: 106
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 5 by 100. Tulsa: 6 by 100. South Alabama: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 5 by 100. TCU: 6 by 100. Texas Tech: 9 by 94.1. Baylor: 6 by 100. Texas: 4 by 53.3. West Virginia: 7 by 86.7. Oklahoma: 7 by 100. Iowa State: 1 by 100. Kansas State: 8 by 100. Kansas: 8 by 88.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.