Player Stats

James Washington College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
4,472
Receptions
226
Touchdowns
40

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 PostseasonOklahoma State12233149.3
2014 Regular SeasonOklahoma State1226423549.3
2015 PostseasonOklahoma State13110065.2
2015 Regular SeasonOklahoma State13521,0771065.2
2016 PostseasonOklahoma State139171178.5
2016 Regular SeasonOklahoma State13621,209978.5
2017 PostseasonOklahoma State135126187.2
2017 Regular SeasonOklahoma State13691,4231387.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Oklahoma State paired 1,549 primary output with 94 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 94 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Baylor

Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Oklahoma State

Games

13

Receiving Yards / G

119.2

Efficiency

94

Usage

23.1

Consistency

77.8

Best Game by takeover score

Baylor

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 126. Tulsa: 145. South Alabama: 98. Pittsburgh: 124. TCU: 153. Texas Tech: 127. Baylor: 235. Texas: 32. West Virginia: 91. Oklahoma: 128. Iowa State: 25. Kansas State: 159. Kansas: 106

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 5 by 100. Tulsa: 6 by 100. South Alabama: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 5 by 100. TCU: 6 by 100. Texas Tech: 9 by 94.1. Baylor: 6 by 100. Texas: 4 by 53.3. West Virginia: 7 by 86.7. Oklahoma: 7 by 100. Iowa State: 1 by 100. Kansas State: 8 by 100. Kansas: 8 by 88.3

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins110.9 · Games = 10 · -35.8 vs Losses
Losses146.7 · Games = 3 · +35.8 vs Wins