Usage Score
23.1
Player Dossier
2014-2017Oklahoma State
James Washington
WR • 6'1" • 205 lbs • Stamford, TX, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
James Washington reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
94
Consistency
77.8
Season Value
73.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Oklahoma State
1414151516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Oklahoma State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
James Washington, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Oklahoma State. James Washington reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Oklahoma State paired 1,549 primary output with 94 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 94 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Baylor
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
119.2
Efficiency
94
Usage
23.1
Consistency
77.8
Best Game by takeover score
Virginia Tech
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Virginia Tech: 126. Tulsa: 145. South Alabama: 98. Pittsburgh: 124. TCU: 153. Texas Tech: 127. Baylor: 235. Texas: 32. West Virginia: 91. Oklahoma: 128. Iowa State: 25. Kansas State: 159. Kansas: 106
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Virginia Tech: 5 by 100. Tulsa: 6 by 100. South Alabama: 2 by 100. Pittsburgh: 5 by 100. TCU: 6 by 100. Texas Tech: 9 by 94.1. Baylor: 6 by 100. Texas: 4 by 53.3. West Virginia: 7 by 86.7. Oklahoma: 7 by 100. Iowa State: 1 by 100. Kansas State: 8 by 100. Kansas: 8 by 88.3
Split Comparison
Wins110.9 · n=10 · -35.8 vs Losses
Losses146.7 · n=3 · +35.8 vs Wins
First Half144 · n=7 · +53.8 vs Second Half
Second Half90.2 · n=6 · -53.8 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Baylor
Best efficiency game
100 vs Virginia Tech
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/28 | vs Virginia Tech100 receiving yards | W 30-21 | — | 5 | 126 | 25.2 | 25.20 | 1 | 65 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs Kansas100 receiving yards · High volume | W 58-17 | — | 8 | 106 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Kansas State100 receiving yards · High volume | L 40-45 | — | 8 | 159 | 19.9 | 19.90 | 2 | 52 |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Iowa State | W 49-42 | — | 1 | 25 | 25 | 25 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Oklahoma100 receiving yards | L 52-62 | — | 7 | 128 | 18.3 | 18.30 | 1 | 51 |
| Sat 10/28 | @ West Virginia2+ TD | W 50-39 | — | 7 | 91 | 12.8 | 13 | 2 | 19 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Texas | W 13-10 | — | 4 | 32 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 10/14 | vs Baylor100 receiving yards | W 59-16 | — | 6 | 235 | 33.9 | 39.20 | 1 | 68 |
| Sun 10/1 | @ Texas Tech100 receiving yards · High volume | W 41-34 | — | 9 | 127 | 14.1 | 14.10 | 1 | 30 |
| Sat 9/23 | vs TCU100 receiving yards | L 31-44 | — | 6 | 153 | 25.5 | 25.50 | 1 | 86 |
| Sat 9/16 | @ Pittsburgh100 receiving yards | W 59-21 | — | 5 | 124 | 24.8 | 24.80 | 0 | 39 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ South Alabama | W 44-7 | — | 2 | 98 | 49 | 49 | 1 | 66 |
| Thu 8/31 | vs Tulsa100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 59-24 | — | 6 | 145 | 20.6 | 24.20 | 2 | 77 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma State
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142014201520152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 456 | 72.6 | 15.4 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 456 | 72.6 | 15.4 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1,087 | 88.7 | 16.3 | 631 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1,087 | 88.7 | 16.3 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1,380 | 87.8 | 23.4 | 293 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1,380 | 87.8 | 23.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 1,549 | 94 | 23.1 | 169 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 1,549 | 94 | 23.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
296
Primary metric
296 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Baylor
114
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Baylor
235
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
235 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
TCU
184
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
184 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Texas Tech
200
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
200 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Oklahoma State
1,549 primary output · 94 efficiency · 23.1 usage
73.7
#2
2017 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
73.7
1,549 primary · 94 efficiency · 23.1 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Oklahoma State
66.4
1,380 primary · 87.8 efficiency · 23.4 usage
Milestones
21
100+ receiving yards
6
8+ catch outings
10
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8785
Amos P. Godby · Havana, FL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
4,472
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 51 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.