Usage Score
9.8
Player Dossier
2014-2018Oklahoma State
Justin Phillips
LB • 6'0" • 230 lbs • Pearland, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Justin Phillips shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
42.1
Consistency
45
Season Value
29
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
1415161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Oklahoma State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Phillips, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Oklahoma State. Justin Phillips shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 42.1 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Oklahoma State paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 42.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Kansas
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Oklahoma State
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.2
Efficiency
42.1
Usage
9.8
Consistency
45
Best Game by takeover score
Missouri
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Missouri: 0. Unknown: 4. South Alabama: 0.5. Boise State: 1. Texas Tech: 1. Kansas: 3. Iowa State: 0. Kansas State: 0. Texas: 0. Baylor: 0. Oklahoma: 1. West Virginia: 3.5. TCU: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Missouri: 6 by 25. Unknown: 5 by 60.8. South Alabama: 3 by 17.5. Boise State: 8 by 43.3. Texas Tech: 8 by 43.3. Kansas: 12 by 80. Iowa State: 6 by 25. Kansas State: 11 by 45.8. Texas: 8 by 33.3. Oklahoma: 8 by 43.3. West Virginia: 6 by 60. TCU: 12 by 70
Split Comparison
Wins1.3 · n=6 · +0.7 vs Losses
Losses0.7 · n=6 · -0.7 vs Wins
First Half1.4 · n=7 · +0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1.1 · n=6 · -0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Kansas
Best efficiency game
80 vs Kansas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/31 | vs Missouri | W 38-33 | 6 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/25 | @ TCU10+ tackles · Splash game | L 24-31 | 12 | 7 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | vs West Virginia | W 45-41 | 6 | 5 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Oklahoma | L 47-48 | 8 | 6 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Baylor | L 31-35 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sun 10/28 | vs Texas | W 38-35 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Kansas State10+ tackles | L 12-31 | 11 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Iowa State | L 42-48 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Kansas10+ tackles · Splash game | W 48-28 | 12 | 10 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Texas Tech | L 17-41 | 8 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Boise State | W 44-21 | 8 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/9 | vs South Alabama | W 55-13 | 3 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/31 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 5 | 3 | — | 3 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma State
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | 0 | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 7 | 21.5 | 5.2 | 7 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 7 | 21.5 | 5.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 16 | 32.5 | 9.9 | 9 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 16 | 32.5 | 9.9 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Oklahoma State | 16 | 42.1 | 9.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma State | 16 | 42.1 | 9.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Texas Tech
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 63.7 takeover score.
#2
Baylor
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 63.1 takeover score.
#3
Kansas
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 58.7 takeover score.
#4
Unknown
4
Primary metric
Game with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.4 takeover score.
#5
West Virginia
3.5
Primary metric
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 55.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2018 Postseason · Oklahoma State
29
16 primary · 42.1 efficiency · 9.8 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Oklahoma State
29
16 primary · 42.1 efficiency · 9.8 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
6
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8475
Pearland · Pearland, TX
- Committed To
- Oklahoma State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
198
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 38 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.