Usage Score
8.5
Player Dossier
2014-2018Texas A&M
Donovan Wilson
DB • 6'1" • 207 lbs • Shreveport, LA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Donovan Wilson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
32.2
Consistency
34.1
Season Value
23
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Texas A&M
141516161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: South Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Donovan Wilson, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Donovan Wilson shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 5 primary output with 25 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 32.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2018 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Ole Miss
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Texas A&M
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
32.2
Usage
8.5
Consistency
34.1
Best Game by takeover score
LSU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 1. Clemson: 0. UL Monroe: 2. Alabama: 0. Arkansas: 1. Kentucky: 0. South Carolina: 0. Mississippi State: 0. Auburn: 0. Ole Miss: 3. UAB: 3. LSU: 1.5
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 3 by 22.5. Clemson: 6 by 25. UL Monroe: 6 by 45. Alabama: 2 by 8.3. Arkansas: 3 by 22.5. Kentucky: 12 by 50. South Carolina: 7 by 29.2. Mississippi State: 1 by 4.2. Auburn: 3 by 12.5. Ole Miss: 5 by 50.8. UAB: 5 by 50.8. LSU: 13 by 65
Split Comparison
Wins1.5 · n=7 · +1.5 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=4 · -1.5 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · n=6 · -0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · n=6 · +0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Ole Miss
Best efficiency game
65 vs LSU
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 11/25 | vs LSU10+ tackles | W 74-72 | 13 | 7 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/18 | vs UABSplash game | W 41-20 | 5 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Ole Miss | W 38-24 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Auburn | L 24-28 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | @ Mississippi State | L 13-28 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | @ South Carolina | W 26-23 | 7 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Kentucky10+ tackles | W 20-14 | 12 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Arkansas | W 24-17 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Alabama | L 23-45 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs UL Monroe | W 48-10 | 6 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Clemson | L 26-28 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Unknown | — | 3 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 5 | 25 | — | 5 |
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 9.5 | 28.4 | 6.5 | 4.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 9.5 | 28.4 | 6.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | -9.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 11.5 | 32.2 | 8.5 | 11.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
South Carolina
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 70 takeover score.
#2
Ole Miss
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 54.7 takeover score.
#3
UAB
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 53.8 takeover score.
#4
Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 52.1 takeover score.
#5
South Carolina
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.4 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Texas A&M
5 primary output · 25 efficiency · — usage
38.1
#2
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
26.5
9.5 primary · 28.4 efficiency · 6.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
26.5
9.5 primary · 28.4 efficiency · 6.5 usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
2
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8689
Muskegon · Muskegon, MI
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
125
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.