Usage Score
11
Player Dossier
2014-2016Texas A&M
Myles Garrett
DL • 6'5" • Arlington, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Myles Garrett shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.3 disruption score.
Efficiency
34.3
Consistency
32.9
Season Value
38.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
14151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Texas A&M
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Myles Garrett, DL. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Texas A&M. Myles Garrett shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 34.3 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Texas A&M paired 25.5 primary output with 34.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 34.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTSA
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
2.5
Efficiency
34.3
Usage
11
Consistency
32.9
Best Game by takeover score
Kansas State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kansas State: 0. UCLA: 2.5. Unknown: 1. Auburn: 4.5. Arkansas: 1. Tennessee: 2. Alabama: 3.5. Ole Miss: 0. UTSA: 10. LSU: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kansas State: 1 by 4.2. UCLA: 3 by 37.5. Unknown: 2 by 18.3. Auburn: 3 by 57.5. Arkansas: 3 by 22.5. Tennessee: 3 by 32.5. Alabama: 7 by 64.2. Ole Miss: 1 by 4.2. UTSA: 8 by 83.3. LSU: 2 by 18.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins4 · Games = 5 · +2.9 vs Losses
Losses1.1 · Games = 4 · -2.9 vs Wins
First Half1.8 · Games = 5 · -1.5 vs Second Half
Second Half3.3 · Games = 5 · +1.5 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
UTSA
Best efficiency game
83.3 vs UTSA
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/29 | @ Kansas State | L 28-33 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/25 | vs LSU | L 39-54 | 2 | 0 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | vs UTSA2+ sacks · Splash game | W 23-10 | 8 | 7 | — | 4.50 | 4.50 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 11/13 | vs Ole Miss | L 28-29 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | @ AlabamaSplash game | L 14-33 | 7 | 3 | — | 3.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Tennessee | W 45-38 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | vs Arkansas | W 45-24 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Auburn2+ sacks · Splash game | W 29-16 | 3 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 2 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Unknown | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs UCLA | W 31-24 | 3 | 1 | — | 1.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 1 | 10 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 25.5 | 34.3 | 11 | 24.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 25.5 | 34.3 | 11 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTSA
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
10
Primary metric
10 disruption/tackle impact with 73.9 takeover score.
#2
Ole Miss
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Auburn
4.5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
4.5 disruption/tackle impact with 39.2 takeover score.
#4
Alabama
3.5
Primary metric
Loss with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 38.3 takeover score.
#5
UCLA
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 24.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
25.5 primary output · 34.3 efficiency · 11 usage
38.9
#2
2016 Regular Season · Texas A&M
38.9
25.5 primary · 34.3 efficiency · 11 usage
#3
2015 Regular Season · Texas A&M
21
1 primary · 10 efficiency · — usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9992
Martin · Arlington, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
33
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 12 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.