Usage Score
4.9
Player Dossier
2013-2019Texas A&M
Nick Harvey
DB • 5'10" • 190 lbs • Lancaster, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Nick Harvey shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
29.5
Consistency
37.7
Season Value
21.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Texas A&M
1314151616171819
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 3
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Texas A&M • South Carolina • North Texas
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Mississippi State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nick Harvey, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · Texas A&M. Nick Harvey shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 29.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
Texas A&M paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 29.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2019 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Multi-stop career journey
Production spans 3 team stops, with role shifts visible across Texas A&M, South Carolina, North Texas.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Middle Tennessee
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2019 Regular Season · North Texas
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
29.5
Usage
4.9
Consistency
37.7
Best Game by takeover score
UAB
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Unknown: 0. SMU: 1. California: 0. UTSA: 2. Houston: 0. Southern Miss: 1. Middle Tennessee: 3. Charlotte: 0. UTEP: 1. Louisiana Tech: 1.5. Rice: 0. UAB: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Unknown: 14 by 50. SMU: 5 by 30.8. UTSA: 3 by 32.5. Houston: 2 by 8.3. Southern Miss: 7 by 39.2. Middle Tennessee: 4 by 46.7. Charlotte: 10 by 41.7. UTEP: 3 by 22.5. Louisiana Tech: 10 by 56.7. Rice: 4 by 16.7. UAB: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins2 · n=3 · +1.6 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · n=8 · -1.6 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · n=6 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half0.9 · n=6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Middle Tennessee
Best efficiency game
56.7 vs Louisiana Tech
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs UAB | L 21-26 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/23 | @ Rice | L 14-20 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/9 | @ Louisiana Tech10+ tackles | L 17-52 | 10 | 6 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/2 | vs UTEP | W 52-26 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ Charlotte10+ tackles | L 38-39 | 10 | 7 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | vs Middle Tennessee | W 33-30 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | @ Southern Miss | L 27-45 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/29 | vs Houston | L 25-46 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/21 | vs UTSA | W 45-3 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ California | L 17-23 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| Sat 9/7 | @ SMU | L 27-49 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | vs Unknown10+ tackles | — | 14 | 11 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Texas A&M
2013-2017
Opening stop
- 2
South Carolina
2018
Peak year stop
- 3
North Texas
2019
Final stop
Season Progression
20132014201520162016201720182019
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2013 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Texas A&M | 12.5 | 33.3 | 4.8 | 12.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 12.5 | 33.3 | 4.8 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Texas A&M | 0 | — | — | -12.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | South Carolina | 1 | 11.7 | 3.3 | 1 |
| 2019 Regular Season | North Texas | 9.5 | 29.5 | 4.9 | 8.5 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Mississippi State
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 58.1 takeover score.
#2
Middle Tennessee
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#3
Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.3 takeover score.
#4
UCLA
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 48.9 takeover score.
#5
Arkansas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.1 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · Texas A&M
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2015 Regular Season · Texas A&M
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Texas A&M
29.3
12.5 primary · 33.3 efficiency · 4.8 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
4
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9708
Fort Bend Travis · Richmond, TX
- Committed To
- Texas A&M
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
3
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
136
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 32 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.