Player Stats

Kendall Blanton College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Receiving yards
476
Receptions
44
Touchdowns
6

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesRecRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonMissouri0-00-
2015 Regular SeasonMissouri0-00-
2016 Regular SeasonMissouri716161363
2017 PostseasonMissouri5123057.3
2017 Regular SeasonMissouri55115157.3
2018 PostseasonMissouri10435164.7
2018 Regular SeasonMissouri1018142164.7

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Missouri paired 177 primary output with 50.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

target-driven usage with 50.8 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma State

Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Missouri

Games

10

Receiving Yards / G

17.7

Efficiency

50.8

Usage

9.9

Consistency

75.2

Best Game by takeover score

Oklahoma State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Oklahoma State: 35. UT Martin: 20. Wyoming: 21. Purdue: 16. Georgia: 21. South Carolina: 18. Alabama: 4. Memphis: 27. Tennessee: 0. Arkansas: 15

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Oklahoma State: 4 by 58.3. UT Martin: 2 by 66.7. Wyoming: 3 by 46.7. Purdue: 2 by 53.3. Georgia: 3 by 46.7. South Carolina: 1 by 100. Alabama: 1 by 26.7. Memphis: 3 by 60. Tennessee: 1 by 0. Arkansas: 2 by 50

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins16.5 · Games = 6 · -3 vs Losses
Losses19.5 · Games = 4 · +3 vs Wins