Player Stats

Tre' Williams College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
113
TFL
6
Sacks
3.5
QB hurries
5
Passes defended
2

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonAuburn00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonAuburn00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonAuburn114-0--064.3
2016 Regular SeasonAuburn11633.5142064.3
2017 PostseasonAuburn94-0--034.9
2017 Regular SeasonAuburn9422.52.51-034.9

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Auburn paired 10.5 primary output with 34.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 28 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Southern

Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Auburn

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

0.7

Efficiency

28

Usage

5.6

Consistency

7.4

Best Game by takeover score

Georgia Southern

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. UCF: 0. Georgia Southern: 5. Clemson: 1. Mercer: 0. Ole Miss: 0. Texas A&M: 0. UL Monroe: 0. Alabama: 0. Georgia: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. UCF: 4 by 16.7. Georgia Southern: 10 by 91.7. Clemson: 9 by 47.5. Mercer: 6 by 25. Ole Miss: 4 by 16.7. Texas A&M: 4 by 16.7. UL Monroe: 3 by 12.5. Alabama: 5 by 20.8. Georgia: 1 by 4.2

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.8 · Games = 6 · +0.5 vs Losses
Losses0.3 · Games = 3 · -0.5 vs Wins