Player Stats

D'Cota Dixon College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
158
TFL
8.5
Sacks
2.5
QB hurries
5
Passes defended
10

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonWisconsin00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonWisconsin00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonWisconsin147-0--060.9
2016 Regular SeasonWisconsin14532.5144060.9
2017 PostseasonWisconsin123-0--049
2017 Regular SeasonWisconsin12523.51.513049
2018 Regular SeasonWisconsin9432.50-3042

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason

Wisconsin paired 15.5 primary output with 28.9 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 26 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value cooled off

2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: New Mexico

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 88.9th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Regular Season · Wisconsin

Games

9

Havoc Plays / G

0.6

Efficiency

26

Usage

6.2

Consistency

54.7

Best Game by takeover score

New Mexico

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Western Kentucky: 0.5. New Mexico: 1. BYU: 1. Iowa: 0. Nebraska: 1. Rutgers: 0. Penn State: 1.5. Purdue: 0. Minnesota: 0.5

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Western Kentucky: 5 by 25.8. New Mexico: 9 by 47.5. BYU: 4 by 26.7. Iowa: 6 by 25. Nebraska: 1 by 14.2. Rutgers: 3 by 12.5. Penn State: 6 by 40. Purdue: 3 by 12.5. Minnesota: 6 by 30

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins0.4 · Games = 6 · -0.6 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 3 · +0.6 vs Wins