Usage Score
7.9
Player Dossier
2014-2017Ohio State
DE • 6'5" • 265 lbs • Cincinnati, OH, USA
Sam Hubbard shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.5 disruption score.
Usage Score
7.9
Efficiency
28.5
Consistency
34
Season Value
29.8
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Ohio State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Sam Hubbard, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Ohio State. Sam Hubbard shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28.5 disruption score.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Ohio State paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 28.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Win with backfield disruption leading the way. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.6
Efficiency
28.5
Usage
7.9
Consistency
34
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 6. Indiana: 2. Oklahoma: 3. Army: 0. Rutgers: 1. Maryland: 1. Nebraska: 0. Penn State: 1.5. Iowa: 0. Michigan State: 1. Illinois: 0. Michigan: 5. Wisconsin: 0
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 4 by 66.7. Indiana: 3 by 32.5. Oklahoma: 6 by 55. Army: 1 by 4.2. Rutgers: 4 by 26.7. Maryland: 4 by 26.7. Nebraska: 1 by 4.2. Penn State: 4 by 31.7. Iowa: 3 by 12.5. Michigan State: 4 by 26.7. Illinois: 1 by 4.2. Michigan: 5 by 70.8. Wisconsin: 2 by 8.3
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
70.8 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 12/30 | vs USC2+ sacks · Splash game | W 24-7 | 4 | 3 | — | 3.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 12/3 | @ Wisconsin | W 27-21 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/25 | @ Michigan2+ sacks · Splash game | W 31-20 | 5 | 4 | — | 2.50 | 2.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | vs Illinois | W 52-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Michigan State | W 48-3 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Iowa | L 24-55 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | vs Penn State | W 39-38 | 4 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Nebraska | W 56-14 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Maryland | W 62-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | @ Rutgers | W 56-0 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Army | W 38-7 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs OklahomaSplash game | L 16-31 | 6 | 4 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/1 | @ Indiana | W 49-21 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio State
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio State | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio State | 14 | 25.5 | 7.9 | 13 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 14 | 25.5 | 7.9 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio State | 20.5 | 28.5 | 7.9 | 6.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 20.5 | 28.5 | 7.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
USC
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6
Primary metric
6 disruption/tackle impact with 61 takeover score.
#2
Maryland
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Michigan
5
Primary metric
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
5 disruption/tackle impact with 59.7 takeover score.
#4
Tulsa
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 59.4 takeover score.
#5
Wisconsin
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 55.5 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Ohio State
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.8
#2
2016 Postseason · Ohio State
30
14 primary · 25.5 efficiency · 7.9 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Ohio State
30
14 primary · 25.5 efficiency · 7.9 usage
2
Impact games
6
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.926
Archbishop Moeller · Cincinnati, OH
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
88
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 27 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Sam Hubbard quick answers
Recruiting profile
4-star recruit