Usage Score
22.8
Player Dossier
2014-2018Ohio State
Parris Campbell
WR • 6'1" • 208 lbs • Akron, OH, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Parris Campbell reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
67.8
Consistency
63.8
Season Value
62.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Ohio State
1415161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Ohio State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Indiana
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Parris Campbell, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Ohio State. Parris Campbell reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Ohio State paired 983 primary output with 67.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 67.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Tulane
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
70.2
Efficiency
67.8
Usage
22.8
Consistency
63.8
Best Game by takeover score
Washington
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Washington: 71. Oregon State: 22. Rutgers: 64. TCU: 66. Tulane: 147. Penn State: 60. Indiana: 142. Minnesota: 56. Purdue: 41. Nebraska: 31. Michigan State: 42. Maryland: 38. Michigan: 114. Northwestern: 89
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 11 by 43. Oregon State: 4 by 36.7. Rutgers: 5 by 85.3. TCU: 2 by 100. Tulane: 8 by 100. Penn State: 7 by 57.1. Indiana: 9 by 100. Minnesota: 8 by 46.7. Purdue: 8 by 34.2. Nebraska: 4 by 51.7. Michigan State: 6 by 46.7. Maryland: 4 by 63.3. Michigan: 5 by 100. Northwestern: 7 by 84.8
Split Comparison
Wins72.5 · n=13
First Half81.7 · n=7 · +23.0 vs Second Half
Second Half58.7 · n=7 · -23.0 vs First Half
All Games70.2 · n=14
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Tulane
Best efficiency game
100 vs Michigan
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs WashingtonHigh volume | W 28-23 | — | 11 | 71 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 1 | 19 |
| Sun 12/2 | vs Northwestern | W 45-24 | — | 7 | 89 | 12.7 | 12.70 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Michigan100 receiving yards | W 62-39 | — | 5 | 114 | 32 | 22.80 | 1 | 33 |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Maryland | W 52-51 | — | 4 | 38 | 9.2 | 9.50 | 0 | 17 |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Michigan State | W 26-6 | — | 6 | 42 | 6.4 | 7 | 1 | 10 |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Nebraska | W 36-31 | — | 4 | 31 | 4.5 | 7.80 | 1 | 13 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ PurdueHigh volume | L 20-49 | — | 8 | 41 | 5.1 | 5.10 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/13 | vs MinnesotaHigh volume | W 30-14 | — | 8 | 56 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 12 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Indiana100 receiving yards · High volume | W 49-26 | — | 9 | 142 | 15.8 | 15.80 | 2 | 71 |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Penn State | W 27-26 | — | 7 | 60 | 8.8 | 8.60 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Tulane100 receiving yards · High volume | W 49-6 | — | 8 | 147 | 18.4 | 18.40 | 2 | 37 |
| Sun 9/16 | @ TCU | W 40-28 | — | 2 | 66 | 20 | 33 | 1 | 63 |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Rutgers | W 52-3 | — | 5 | 64 | 10.3 | 12.80 | 1 | 16 |
| Sat 9/1 | vs Oregon State | W 77-31 | — | 4 | 22 | 5.5 | 5.50 | 1 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio State | 121 | 65 | 9.3 | 121 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 121 | 65 | 9.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Ohio State | 584 | 65.5 | 16.3 | 463 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Ohio State | 584 | 65.5 | 16.3 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Ohio State | 983 | 67.8 | 22.8 | 399 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Ohio State | 983 | 67.8 | 22.8 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Indiana
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
136
Primary metric
136 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Tulane
147
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
147 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Indiana
142
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
142 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Michigan
114
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
114 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
UNLV
105
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
105 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Ohio State
983 primary output · 67.8 efficiency · 22.8 usage
62.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Ohio State
62.5
983 primary · 67.8 efficiency · 22.8 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Ohio State
48.6
584 primary · 65.5 efficiency · 16.3 usage
Milestones
5
100+ receiving yards
5
8+ catch outings
2
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9389
St. Vincent-St. Mary · Akron, OH
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
1,688
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.