Usage Score
14.9
Player Dossier
2014-2016Ohio State
Noah Brown
WR • 6'2" • Flanders, NJ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Noah Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
82.5
Consistency
62.5
Season Value
65
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio State
1414151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Ohio State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Noah Brown, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Ohio State. Noah Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Ohio State paired 402 primary output with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Ohio State
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
33.5
Efficiency
82.5
Usage
14.9
Consistency
62.5
Best Game by takeover score
Clemson
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 17. Bowling Green: 46. Tulsa: 16. Oklahoma: 72. Rutgers: 15. Indiana: 16. Wisconsin: 48. Penn State: 45. Northwestern: 51. Nebraska: 14. Maryland: 22. Michigan: 40
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 2 by 56.7. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. Tulsa: 1 by 100. Oklahoma: 5 by 96. Rutgers: 1 by 100. Indiana: 2 by 53.3. Wisconsin: 4 by 80. Penn State: 3 by 100. Northwestern: 5 by 68. Nebraska: 2 by 46.7. Maryland: 1 by 100. Michigan: 3 by 88.9
Split Comparison
Wins34 · n=10 · +3 vs Losses
Losses31 · n=2 · -3 vs Wins
First Half30.3 · n=6 · -6.3 vs Second Half
Second Half36.7 · n=6 · +6.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
100 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 1/1 | @ Clemson | L 0-31 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Michigan | W 30-27 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Maryland | W 62-3 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs Nebraska | W 62-3 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Northwestern | W 24-20 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 10/23 | @ Penn State | L 21-24 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 34 |
| Sun 10/16 | @ Wisconsin | W 30-23 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Indiana | W 38-17 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Rutgers | W 58-0 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Oklahoma2+ TD | W 45-24 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 4 | 37 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Tulsa | W 48-3 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Bowling Green | W 77-10 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Ohio State
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Ohio State | 9 | 60 | 5 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio State | 9 | 60 | 5 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | -9 |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio State | 402 | 82.5 | 14.9 | 402 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 402 | 82.5 | 14.9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Oklahoma
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72
Primary metric
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
#2
Bowling Green
46
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Penn State
45
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
45 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Wisconsin
48
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#5
Illinois
9
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
9 receiving yards with a 60 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Ohio State
402 primary output · 82.5 efficiency · 14.9 usage
65
#2
2016 Regular Season · Ohio State
65
402 primary · 82.5 efficiency · 14.9 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Ohio State
29.3
9 primary · 60 efficiency · 5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9219
Pope John XXIII · Sparta, NJ
- Committed To
- Ohio State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
411
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 14 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.