Usage / Role
15%
Rotational offensive role
Player Dossier
2014-2016Ohio State
WR • 6'2" • Flanders, NJ, USA
Noah Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Usage / Role
15%
Rotational offensive role
Impact Production
17
Developing production for a receiver
Reliability
15
Sporadic game-to-game production
Star Power
29
Limited ceiling signals so far
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Ohio State
Snapshot
Player Story
Noah Brown built his college career from 2014 through 2016 as a wide receiver from Flanders, NJ wearing No. 80, spending time with Ohio State. The clearest part of Noah Brown's career was his receiving role: 33...
Read the storyNFL Draft
Noah Brown, WR. Best season Best season by Season Value: 2016 Postseason · Ohio State. Noah Brown reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Stat Footprint
Quick Answers
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Rec | Rec Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Ohio State | 2 | - | 0 | 0 | 32.2 |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio State | 2 | 1 | 9 | 0 | 32.2 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | - | 0 | 0 | - |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio State | 12 | 2 | 17 | 0 | 73.7 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 12 | 30 | 385 | 7 | 73.7 |
Related Context
Noah Brown played WR for Ohio State. Across 3 tracked seasons, Noah Brown recorded -4 rushing yards, 411 receiving yards, and 1 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Ohio State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Ohio State paired 402 primary output with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 82.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oklahoma
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
12
Receiving Yards / G
33.5
Efficiency
82.5
Usage
14.9
Consistency
62.5
Best Game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Clemson: 17. Bowling Green: 46. Tulsa: 16. Oklahoma: 72. Rutgers: 15. Indiana: 16. Wisconsin: 48. Penn State: 45. Northwestern: 51. Nebraska: 14. Maryland: 22. Michigan: 40
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Clemson: 2 by 56.7. Bowling Green: 3 by 100. Tulsa: 1 by 100. Oklahoma: 5 by 96. Rutgers: 1 by 100. Indiana: 2 by 53.3. Wisconsin: 4 by 80. Penn State: 3 by 100. Northwestern: 5 by 68. Nebraska: 2 by 46.7. Maryland: 1 by 100. Michigan: 3 by 88.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Oklahoma
Best efficiency game
100 vs Maryland
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 1/1 | @ Clemson | L 0-31 | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 | 8.50 | 0 | 9 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Michigan | W 30-27 | — | 3 | 40 | 13.3 | 13.30 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Maryland | W 62-3 | — | 1 | 22 | 22 | 22 | 0 | 22 |
| Sun 11/6 | vs Nebraska | W 62-3 | — | 2 | 14 | 7 | 7 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 10/29 | vs Northwestern | W 24-20 | — | 5 | 51 | 10.2 | 10.20 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 10/23 | @ Penn State | L 21-24 | — | 3 | 45 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 34 |
| Sun 10/16 | @ Wisconsin | W 30-23 | — | 4 | 48 | 12 | 12 | 1 | 21 |
| Sat 10/8 | vs Indiana | W 38-17 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 11 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Rutgers | W 58-0 | — | 1 | 15 | 15 | 15 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/17 | @ Oklahoma2+ TD | W 45-24 | — | 5 | 72 | 14.4 | 14.40 | 4 | 37 |
| Sat 9/10 | vs Tulsa | W 48-3 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Bowling Green | W 77-10 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 25 |
Player Story
Noah Brown built his college career from 2014 through 2016 as a wide receiver from Flanders, NJ wearing No. 80, spending time with Ohio State. The clearest part of Noah Brown's career was his receiving role: 33 catches, 411 receiving yards, and 7 touchdowns across 14 career games in the available record. His largest box-score season came in 2016 with Ohio State. Those numbers show where he fit, how often the ball or action found him, and how his role developed over time.
The value of the career arc is that it connects production to role, not just a name on a roster. His career also includes 1 tackle and 23 return yards, giving the story more than a single-category snapshot. With 14 career games in the available record, his career has enough shape to show both opportunity and production across Ohio State.
The arc is straightforward: Noah Brown moved through the depth chart, found a larger role, and turned that opportunity into production that can be understood through standard football numbers.
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Ohio State
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Value Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Ohio State | 9 | 60 | 5 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Ohio State | 9 | 60 | 5 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Ohio State | 0 | — | — | -9 |
| 2016 Postseason | Ohio State | 402 | 82.5 | 14.9 | 402 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Ohio State | 402 | 82.5 | 14.9 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
@ Oklahoma
Week 3 · W 45-24
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
72
Receiving Yards
98.7 takeover
72 receiving yards with a 96 efficiency score.
#2
@ Wisconsin
Week 7 · W 30-23 · Conference game
48
Receiving Yards
75 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
48 receiving yards with a 80 efficiency score.
#3
vs Northwestern
Week 9 · W 24-20 · Conference game
51
Receiving Yards
72.7 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
51 receiving yards with a 68 efficiency score.
#4
vs Michigan
Week 13 · W 30-27 · Conference game
40
Receiving Yards
70.4 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#5
vs Bowling Green
Week 1 · W 77-10
46
Receiving Yards
67 takeover
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#1 Season by Season Value
2016 Postseason · Ohio State
402 primary output · 82.5 efficiency · 14.9 usage
73.7
#2
2016 Regular Season · Ohio State
73.7
402 primary · 82.5 efficiency · 14.9 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Ohio State
32.2
9 primary · 60 efficiency · 5 usage
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.