Usage Score
15.7
Player Dossier
2014-2016Stanford
Solomon Thomas
DE • 6'3" • Coppell, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Solomon Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
36.5
Consistency
42.3
Season Value
33.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Stanford
14151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 4
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Solomon Thomas, DE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Stanford. Solomon Thomas shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 36.5 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Stanford paired 22 primary output with 36.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 36.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Notre Dame
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Stanford
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
1.7
Efficiency
36.5
Usage
15.7
Consistency
42.3
Best Game by takeover score
North Carolina
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. North Carolina: 3. Kansas State: 1. USC: 1. UCLA: 3. Washington: 0. Washington State: 2. Notre Dame: 3. Colorado: 3. Arizona: 4. Oregon State: 1. Oregon: 0. California: 0. Rice: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. North Carolina: 7 by 59.2. Kansas State: 4 by 26.7. USC: 3 by 22.5. UCLA: 3 by 42.5. Washington: 5 by 20.8. Washington State: 3 by 32.5. Notre Dame: 12 by 80. Colorado: 6 by 55. Arizona: 4 by 56.7. Oregon State: 2 by 18.3. Oregon: 3 by 12.5. California: 4 by 16.7. Rice: 5 by 30.8
Split Comparison
Wins1.7 · n=10 · +0.0 vs Losses
Losses1.7 · n=3 · -0.0 vs Wins
First Half1.9 · n=7 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half1.5 · n=6 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Notre Dame
Best efficiency game
80 vs Notre Dame
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/30 | @ North CarolinaSplash game | W 25-23 | 7 | 5 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/27 | vs Rice | W 41-17 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/19 | @ California | W 45-31 | 4 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Oregon | W 52-27 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Oregon State | W 26-15 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/30 | @ ArizonaSplash game | W 34-10 | 4 | 2 | — | 2.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/22 | vs Colorado | L 5-10 | 6 | 3 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/15 | @ Notre Dame10+ tackles | W 17-10 | 12 | 10 | — | 1.50 | 1.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/9 | vs Washington State | L 16-42 | 3 | 3 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/1 | @ Washington | L 6-44 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/25 | @ UCLASplash game | W 22-13 | 3 | 3 | — | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/18 | vs USC | W 27-10 | 3 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Kansas State | W 26-13 | 4 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Stanford | 22 | 36.5 | 15.7 | 22 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Stanford | 22 | 36.5 | 15.7 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Notre Dame
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Arizona
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 58.2 takeover score.
#3
North Carolina
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.8 takeover score.
#4
Colorado
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 49.2 takeover score.
#5
UCLA
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 45.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Stanford
22 primary output · 36.5 efficiency · 15.7 usage
33.6
#2
2016 Regular Season · Stanford
33.6
22 primary · 36.5 efficiency · 15.7 usage
#3
2014 Regular Season · Stanford
—
0 primary · — efficiency · — usage
Milestones
1
Impact games
3
Splash games
1
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
5★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9885
Coppell · Coppell, TX
- Committed To
- Stanford
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
4
Seasons tracked
61
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 4 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.