Usage Score
13.6
Player Dossier
2014-2017Stanford
Dalton Schultz
TE • 6'6" • 242 lbs • South Jordan, UT, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Dalton Schultz reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
60.7
Consistency
51.9
Season Value
56.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Stanford
141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Dalton Schultz, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason · Stanford. Dalton Schultz reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
Stanford paired 222 primary output with 60 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 60.7 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Arizona State
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Stanford
Games
11
Receiving Yards / G
19.3
Efficiency
60.7
Usage
13.6
Consistency
51.9
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. TCU: 8. Rice: 41. USC: 7. San Diego State: 16. UCLA: 15. Arizona State: 46. Utah: 29. Oregon: 8. Oregon State: 19. Notre Dame: 15. USC: 8
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. TCU: 2 by 26.7. Rice: 2 by 100. USC: 2 by 23.3. San Diego State: 1 by 100. UCLA: 3 by 33.3. Arizona State: 3 by 100. Utah: 3 by 64.4. Oregon: 1 by 53.3. Oregon State: 2 by 63.3. Notre Dame: 2 by 50. USC: 1 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Wins24.7 · n=7 · +15.0 vs Losses
Losses9.8 · n=4 · -15.0 vs Wins
First Half22.2 · n=6 · +6.4 vs Second Half
Second Half15.8 · n=5 · -6.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Arizona State
Best efficiency game
100 vs Arizona State
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | @ TCU | L 37-39 | — | 2 | 8 | 4 | 4 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 12/2 | @ USC | L 28-31 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 11/26 | vs Notre Dame | W 38-20 | — | 2 | 15 | 7.5 | 7.50 | 1 | 12 |
| Fri 10/27 | @ Oregon State | W 15-14 | — | 2 | 19 | 9.5 | 9.50 | 0 | 15 |
| Sun 10/15 | vs Oregon | W 49-7 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sun 10/8 | @ Utah | W 23-20 | — | 3 | 29 | 9.7 | 9.70 | 0 | 16 |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Arizona State | W 34-24 | — | 3 | 46 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 0 | 36 |
| Sun 9/24 | vs UCLA | W 58-34 | — | 3 | 15 | 5 | 5 | 1 | 9 |
| Sun 9/17 | @ San Diego State | L 17-20 | — | 1 | 16 | 16 | 16 | 0 | 16 |
| Sun 9/10 | @ USC | L 24-42 | — | 2 | 7 | 3.5 | 3.50 | 1 | 6 |
| Sun 8/27 | @ Rice | W 62-7 | — | 2 | 41 | 20.5 | 20.50 | 0 | 25 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 121 | 70.8 | 7.7 | 121 |
| 2016 Postseason | Stanford | 222 | 60 | 14.4 | 101 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Stanford | 222 | 60 | 14.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Stanford | 212 | 60.7 | 13.6 | -10 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Stanford | 212 | 60.7 | 13.6 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Arizona State
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
46
Primary metric
46 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Rice
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
USC
40
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
40 receiving yards with a 88.9 efficiency score.
#4
Rice
41
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
41 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oregon
38
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
38 receiving yards with a 63.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Postseason · Stanford
222 primary output · 60 efficiency · 14.4 usage
60.2
#2
2016 Regular Season · Stanford
60.2
222 primary · 60 efficiency · 14.4 usage
#3
2017 Postseason · Stanford
56.5
212 primary · 60.7 efficiency · 13.6 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.953
Bingham · South Jordan, UT
- Committed To
- Stanford
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
555
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 33 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.