Usage Score
5.7
Player Dossier
2014-2018Stanford
ILB • 6'2" • 219 lbs • Carlsbad, CA, USA
Jordan Perez shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Usage Score
5.7
Efficiency
21.6
Consistency
9.5
Season Value
10.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Stanford
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Jordan Perez, ILB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Stanford. Jordan Perez shows a ball-hunting defender profile with partial disruption data.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Stanford paired 4 primary output with 21.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Oregon State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
14
Havoc Plays / G
0.3
Efficiency
21.6
Usage
5.7
Consistency
9.5
Best Game by takeover score
TCU
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. TCU: 0.5. Rice: 0. USC: 0. San Diego State: 0. UCLA: 0. Arizona State: 0. Utah: 0. Oregon: 0. Oregon State: 2. Washington State: 1. Washington: 0. California: 0. Notre Dame: 0. USC: 0.5
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. TCU: 6 by 30. Rice: 3 by 12.5. USC: 2 by 8.3. San Diego State: 5 by 20.8. UCLA: 6 by 25. Arizona State: 8 by 33.3. Utah: 6 by 25. Oregon: 2 by 8.3. Oregon State: 7 by 49.2. Washington State: 5 by 30.8. Washington: 2 by 8.3. California: 5 by 20.8. Notre Dame: 4 by 16.7. USC: 2 by 13.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Oregon State
Best efficiency game
49.2 vs Oregon State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | @ TCU | L 37-39 | 6 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | @ USC | L 28-31 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/26 | vs Notre Dame | W 38-20 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | vs California | W 17-14 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Washington | W 30-22 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Washington State | L 21-24 | 5 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/27 | @ Oregon State | W 15-14 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/15 | vs Oregon | W 49-7 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/8 | @ Utah | W 23-20 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs Arizona State | W 34-24 | 8 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/24 | vs UCLA | W 58-34 | 6 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/17 | @ San Diego State | L 17-20 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/10 | @ USC | L 24-42 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 8/27 | @ Rice | W 62-7 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Stanford | 3.5 | 12.6 | 2.9 | 3.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Stanford | 3.5 | 12.6 | 2.9 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Stanford | 4 | 21.6 | 5.7 | 0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Stanford | 4 | 21.6 | 5.7 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | -4 |
#1 Featured game
Oregon State
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 57.1 takeover score.
#2
Colorado
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.5 takeover score.
#3
North Carolina
1.5
Primary metric
Win with 1.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1.5 disruption/tackle impact with 34 takeover score.
#4
Washington State
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 30 takeover score.
#5
TCU
0.5
Primary metric
Loss with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 21.7 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Stanford
4 primary output · 21.6 efficiency · 5.7 usage
10.9
#2
2017 Regular Season · Stanford
10.9
4 primary · 21.6 efficiency · 5.7 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Stanford
6.8
3.5 primary · 12.6 efficiency · 2.9 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8578
Carlsbad · Carlsbad, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
91
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 26 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.
Jordan Perez quick answers
Recruiting profile
3-star recruit