Usage Score
2.3
Player Dossier
2014-2017Stanford
FB • 6'2" • 255 lbs • Trabuco Canyon, CA, USA
Daniel Marx leans balanced backfield option traits and 44.4 efficiency.
Usage Score
2.3
Efficiency
44.4
Consistency
36.3
Season Value
43.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Stanford
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Daniel Marx, FB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Stanford. Daniel Marx leans balanced backfield option traits and 44.4 efficiency.
Daniel Marx played FB for Stanford. Across 4 tracked seasons, Daniel Marx recorded 7 rushing yards, 59 receiving yards, and 3 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Stanford.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Stanford paired 25 primary output with 61.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 44.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington State
Loss with 24 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
4
Scrimmage Yards / G
8.5
Efficiency
44.4
Usage
2.3
Consistency
36.3
Best Game by takeover score
California
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. UCLA: 0. Washington State: 24. Washington: 3. California: 7
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington State: 2 by 50. Washington: 1 by 25. California: 1 by 58.3
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
4 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Washington State
Best efficiency game
58.3 vs California
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Stanford
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Stanford | 6 | 15.7 | 2.5 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 6 | 15.7 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 25 | 61.1 | 1.4 | 19 |
| 2016 Postseason | Stanford | 1 | 10.4 | 1 | -24 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Stanford | 1 | 10.4 | 1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Stanford | 34 | 44.4 | 2.3 | 33 |
#1 Featured game
Washington
Win with 15 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
15
Primary metric
15 scrimmage yards and 1.5 usage.
#2
Washington State
24
Primary metric
Loss with 24 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
24 scrimmage yards and 5.6 usage.
#3
Maryland
6
Primary metric
Win with 6 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
6 scrimmage yards and 3.2 usage.
#4
North Carolina
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
1 scrimmage yards and 1.9 usage.
#5
California
7
Primary metric
Win with 7 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
7 scrimmage yards and 1.8 usage.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Stanford
25 primary output · 61.1 efficiency · 1.4 usage
43.9
#2
2017 Regular Season · Stanford
43.7
34 primary · 44.4 efficiency · 2.3 usage
#3
2014 Postseason · Stanford
21.1
6 primary · 15.7 efficiency · 2.5 usage
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8336
Mission Viejo · Mission Viejo, CA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
66
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 11 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.