Usage Score
5
Player Dossier
2014-2018Stanford
Alijah Holder
CB • 6'2" • 184 lbs • Oceanside, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Alijah Holder shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.4 disruption score.
Efficiency
32.4
Consistency
50.1
Season Value
27.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Stanford
141516171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Stanford
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Alijah Holder, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Stanford. Alijah Holder shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 32.4 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Stanford paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 32.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Washington
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Stanford
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
1.0
Efficiency
32.4
Usage
5
Consistency
50.1
Best Game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Pittsburgh: 1. USC: 1.5. Unknown: 3. Oregon: 1. Notre Dame: 1. Utah: 0. Arizona State: 0. Washington State: 0. Washington: 4. UCLA: 0. California: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Pittsburgh: 6 by 35. USC: 4 by 31.7. Unknown: 6 by 55. Oregon: 4 by 26.7. Notre Dame: 10 by 51.7. Utah: 3 by 12.5. Arizona State: 2 by 8.3. Washington State: 10 by 41.7. Washington: 7 by 69.2. UCLA: 3 by 12.5. California: 3 by 12.5
Split Comparison
Wins0.6 · n=6 · -0.7 vs Losses
Losses1.3 · n=4 · +0.7 vs Wins
First Half1.3 · n=6 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · n=5 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Washington
Best efficiency game
69.2 vs Washington
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 12/31 | @ Pittsburgh | W 14-13 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 12/1 | @ California | W 23-13 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | @ UCLA | W 49-42 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/4 | @ Washington | L 23-27 | 7 | 5 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Washington State10+ tackles | L 38-41 | 10 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/19 | @ Arizona State | W 20-13 | 2 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/7 | vs Utah | L 21-40 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | @ Notre Dame10+ tackles | L 17-38 | 10 | 8 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sun 9/23 | @ Oregon | W 38-31 | 4 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Unknown | — | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 3 | — | — |
| Sun 9/9 | vs USC | W 17-3 | 4 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Stanford
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Stanford | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Stanford | 1 | 20 | — | 1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Stanford | 7 | 28 | 4.7 | 6 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Stanford | 6 | 21.6 | 6.5 | -1 |
| 2018 Postseason | Stanford | 11.5 | 32.4 | 5 | 5.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Stanford | 11.5 | 32.4 | 5 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Washington
Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4
Primary metric
4 disruption/tackle impact with 60.1 takeover score.
#2
UCLA
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
San Diego State
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 50.5 takeover score.
#4
Kansas State
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 48.3 takeover score.
#5
Unknown
3
Primary metric
Game with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 44.8 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Stanford
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.6
#2
2018 Postseason · Stanford
27.3
11.5 primary · 32.4 efficiency · 5 usage
#3
2018 Regular Season · Stanford
27.3
11.5 primary · 32.4 efficiency · 5 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
0
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8881
Dutchtown · Geismar, LA
- Committed To
- Tennessee
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
95
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 24 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.