Usage Score
9
Player Dossier
2014-2017NC State
Justin Jones
DT • 6'2" • 312 lbs • Austell, GA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Justin Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.2 disruption score.
Efficiency
27.2
Consistency
45.9
Season Value
28.4
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · NC State
141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- NC State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Justin Jones, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · NC State. Justin Jones shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.2 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
NC State paired 13 primary output with 27.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 27.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Syracuse
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · NC State
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
1.3
Efficiency
27.2
Usage
9
Consistency
45.9
Best Game by takeover score
Arizona State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Arizona State: 0. Marshall: 0. Unknown: 1. Florida State: 2. Syracuse: 3.5. Louisville: 0.5. Pittsburgh: 1. Notre Dame: 1. Boston College: 2. Wake Forest: 2
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Arizona State: 4 by 16.7. Unknown: 7 by 39.2. Florida State: 1 by 24.2. Syracuse: 7 by 64.2. Louisville: 3 by 17.5. Pittsburgh: 1 by 14.2. Notre Dame: 1 by 14.2. Boston College: 5 by 40.8. Wake Forest: 5 by 40.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.3 · Games = 7 · -0.2 vs Losses
Losses1.5 · Games = 2 · +0.2 vs Wins
First Half1.3 · Games = 5 · +0 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · Games = 5 · +0 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Syracuse
Best efficiency game
64.2 vs Syracuse
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | @ Arizona State | W 52-31 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/19 | @ Wake ForestSplash game | L 24-30 | 5 | 2 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | @ Boston College | W 17-14 | 5 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Notre Dame | L 14-35 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Pittsburgh | W 35-17 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 10/6 | vs Louisville | W 39-25 | 3 | 0 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs SyracuseSplash game | W 33-25 | 7 | 3 | — | 2.50 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Florida State | W 27-21 | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Unknown | — | 7 | 4 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Marshall | W 37-20 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
NC State
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | NC State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | NC State | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | NC State | 10.5 | 22.2 | 7.2 | 10.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | NC State | 10.5 | 22.2 | 7.2 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | NC State | 13 | 27.2 | 9 | 2.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | NC State | 13 | 27.2 | 9 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Syracuse
Win with 3.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3.5
Primary metric
3.5 disruption/tackle impact with 61 takeover score.
#2
Florida State
3
Primary metric
Loss with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 60.1 takeover score.
#3
Vanderbilt
3
Primary metric
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3 disruption/tackle impact with 52.7 takeover score.
#4
Wake Forest
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 39.8 takeover score.
#5
Old Dominion
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 39.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · NC State
13 primary output · 27.2 efficiency · 9 usage
28.4
#2
2017 Regular Season · NC State
28.4
13 primary · 27.2 efficiency · 9 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · NC State
16.9
10.5 primary · 22.2 efficiency · 7.2 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
3
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8767
South Cobb · Austell, GA
- Committed To
- NC State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
78
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 23 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.