Player Stats

M.J. Stewart College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
111
TFL
8.5
Sacks
2
QB hurries
2
Passes defended
23

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina20-0--043.2
2015 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina40-0--046.3
2016 PostseasonNorth Carolina137-0-1050.9
2016 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina13593.50-10050.9
2017 Regular SeasonNorth Carolina124552212052.6

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season

North Carolina paired 21 primary output with 32.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Regular Season role shape

impact-led usage with 32.3 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Duke

Loss with 6 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Regular Season · North Carolina

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.8

Efficiency

32.3

Usage

5.4

Consistency

33.2

Best Game by takeover score

Duke

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. California: 2. Louisville: 1. Old Dominion: 2. Duke: 6. Georgia Tech: 1. Notre Dame: 1. Virginia: 3. Virginia Tech: 0. Miami: 4. Pittsburgh: 1. Western Carolina: 0. NC State: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 3 by 32.5. Louisville: 6 by 35. Old Dominion: 5 by 40.8. Duke: 2 by 58.3. Georgia Tech: 2 by 18.3. Notre Dame: 4 by 26.7. Virginia: 1 by 34.2. Virginia Tech: 7 by 29.2. Miami: 3 by 52.5. Pittsburgh: 4 by 26.7. Western Carolina: 2 by 8.3. NC State: 6 by 25

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1 · Games = 3 · -1 vs Losses
Losses2 · Games = 9 · +1 vs Wins