Usage Score
5.3
Player Dossier
2014-2017Georgia Tech
Step Durham
DB • 5'11" • 194 lbs • Jacksonville, FL, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Step Durham shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.5 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.5
Consistency
55.5
Season Value
27
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
1415161617
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 5
- Program Path
- Georgia Tech
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Step Durham, DB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Georgia Tech. Step Durham shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.5 disruption score.
Step Durham played DB for Georgia Tech. Across 4 tracked seasons, Step Durham recorded 65 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Georgia Tech.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Georgia Tech paired 8 primary output with 21.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 21.5 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value is trending up
2017 Regular Season improved on the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: North Carolina
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
Games
10
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
21.5
Usage
5.3
Consistency
55.5
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Tennessee: 1. Unknown: 1. Pittsburgh: 1. North Carolina: 2. Miami: 0. Wake Forest: 2. Clemson: 0. Virginia Tech: 0. Duke: 1. Georgia: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Tennessee: 4 by 26.7. Pittsburgh: 3 by 22.5. North Carolina: 2 by 28.3. Miami: 3 by 12.5. Wake Forest: 5 by 40.8. Clemson: 8 by 33.3. Virginia Tech: 1 by 4.2. Duke: 3 by 22.5. Georgia: 1 by 4.2
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.3 · Games = 4 · +0.8 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · Games = 5 · -0.8 vs Wins
First Half1 · Games = 5 · +0.4 vs Second Half
Second Half0.6 · Games = 5 · -0.4 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
10 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
North Carolina
Best efficiency game
40.8 vs Wake Forest
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/25 | vs Georgia | L 7-38 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Duke | L 20-43 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/11 | vs Virginia Tech | W 28-22 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/29 | @ Clemson | L 10-24 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/21 | vs Wake Forest | W 38-24 | 5 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 2 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Miami | L 24-25 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/30 | vs North Carolina | W 33-7 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | vs Pittsburgh | W 35-17 | 3 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | vs Unknown | — | — | — | — | — | — | 1 | — | — | — |
| Tue 9/5 | vs Tennessee | L 41-42 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Georgia Tech
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620162017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Georgia Tech | 6 | 18.7 | 2.5 | 6 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 6 | 18.7 | 2.5 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Georgia Tech | 8 | 21.5 | 5.3 | 2 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
North Carolina
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#2
Wake Forest
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.8 takeover score.
#3
Boston College
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45 takeover score.
#4
Kentucky
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 30.1 takeover score.
#5
North Carolina
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 28.3 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
8 primary output · 21.5 efficiency · 5.3 usage
27
#2
2016 Postseason · Georgia Tech
14
6 primary · 18.7 efficiency · 2.5 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Georgia Tech
14
6 primary · 18.7 efficiency · 2.5 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8825
Atlantic Coast · Jacksonville, FL
- Committed To
- Georgia Tech
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
65
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 21 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.