Usage Score
3.3
Player Dossier
2016-2019Duke
DT • 6'1" • 305 lbs • Miami, FL, USA
Edgar Cerenord shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 13.6 disruption score.
Usage Score
3.3
Efficiency
13.6
Consistency
9.1
Season Value
9.9
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Duke
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Edgar Cerenord, DT. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Duke. Edgar Cerenord shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 13.6 disruption score.
Edgar Cerenord played DT for Duke. Across 4 tracked seasons, Edgar Cerenord recorded 77 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Duke.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Duke paired 5 primary output with 16 efficiency.
Supporting note
2019 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 13.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2019 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
11
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
13.6
Usage
3.3
Consistency
9.1
Best Game by takeover score
Miami
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 0. Middle Tennessee: 2. Virginia Tech: 0. Pittsburgh: 2. Georgia Tech: 0. Virginia: 0. North Carolina: 0. Notre Dame: 0.5. Syracuse: 0. Wake Forest: 0. Miami: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 1 by 4.2. Middle Tennessee: 2 by 28.3. Virginia Tech: 2 by 8.3. Pittsburgh: 5 by 40.8. Georgia Tech: 1 by 4.2. Virginia: 4 by 16.7. North Carolina: 1 by 4.2. Notre Dame: 2 by 13.3. Syracuse: 3 by 12.5. Wake Forest: 1 by 4.2. Miami: 3 by 12.5
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Pittsburgh
Best efficiency game
40.8 vs Pittsburgh
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sat 11/30 | vs Miami | W 27-17 | 3 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/24 | @ Wake Forest | L 27-39 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/16 | vs Syracuse | L 6-49 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 11/10 | vs Notre Dame | L 7-38 | 2 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/26 | @ North Carolina | L 17-20 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/19 | @ Virginia | L 14-48 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/12 | vs Georgia Tech | W 41-23 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/6 | vs Pittsburgh | L 30-33 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0.50 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 9/27 | @ Virginia Tech | W 45-10 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/14 | @ Middle Tennessee | W 41-18 | 2 | 1 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 8/31 | @ Alabama | L 3-42 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Duke
2016-2019
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 Regular Season | Duke | 0.5 | 5.4 | 2.3 | — |
| 2017 Postseason | Duke | 5 | 16 | 4 | 4.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Duke | 5 | 16 | 4 | 0 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Duke | 0.5 | 15.9 | 3 | -4.5 |
| 2019 Regular Season | Duke | 4.5 | 13.6 | 3.3 | 4 |
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2
Primary metric
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51 takeover score.
#2
Florida State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 50.1 takeover score.
#3
Pittsburgh
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 47.6 takeover score.
#4
Middle Tennessee
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.3 takeover score.
#5
Miami
1
Primary metric
Loss with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 28.4 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Duke
5 primary output · 16 efficiency · 4 usage
10.9
#2
2017 Regular Season · Duke
10.9
5 primary · 16 efficiency · 4 usage
#3
2019 Regular Season · Duke
9.9
4.5 primary · 13.6 efficiency · 3.3 usage
0
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8544
American Heritage · Fort Lauderdale, FL
Career Facts
1
Career teams
5
Seasons tracked
77
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 5 tracked seasons, 31 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.