Usage Score
7.4
Player Dossier
2014-2018Duke
Davis Koppenhaver
TE • 6'4" • 240 lbs • Valencia, CA, USA
Reliable chain-moverPossession profile
Davis Koppenhaver reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
45.3
Consistency
36.2
Season Value
40.1
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Duke
14151617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Duke
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Georgia Tech
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Davis Koppenhaver, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season · Duke. Davis Koppenhaver reads as a reliable chain-mover based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Davis Koppenhaver played TE for Duke. Across 5 tracked seasons, Davis Koppenhaver recorded 431 receiving yards, 1 tackles, and 12 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2016 with Duke.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Regular Season
Duke paired 157 primary output with 57.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 45.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Virginia
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Duke
Games
9
Receiving Yards / G
12.8
Efficiency
45.3
Usage
7.4
Consistency
36.2
Best Game by takeover score
Temple
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Temple: 4. Army: 8. Northwestern: 13. Unknown: 20. Virginia Tech: 7. Georgia Tech: 1. Virginia: 44. North Carolina: 2. Clemson: 16
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Temple: 1 by 26.7. Army: 1 by 53.3. Northwestern: 2 by 43.3. Unknown: 2 by 66.7. Virginia Tech: 1 by 46.7. Georgia Tech: 1 by 6.7. Virginia: 3 by 97.8. North Carolina: 1 by 13.3. Clemson: 2 by 53.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins5.6 · Games = 5 · -16.7 vs Losses
Losses22.3 · Games = 3 · +16.7 vs Wins
First Half10.4 · Games = 5 · -5.3 vs Second Half
Second Half15.8 · Games = 4 · +5.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
Virginia
Best efficiency game
97.8 vs Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Thu 12/27 | vs Temple | W 56-27 | — | 1 | 4 | 4 | 4 | 1 | 4 |
| Sun 11/18 | @ Clemson | L 6-35 | — | 2 | 16 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs North Carolina | W 42-35 | — | 1 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 1 | 2 |
| Sat 10/20 | vs Virginia | L 14-28 | — | 3 | 44 | 14.7 | 14.70 | 1 | 22 |
| Sat 10/13 | @ Georgia Tech | W 28-14 | — | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 1 |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Virginia Tech | L 14-31 | — | 1 | 7 | 7 | 7 | 0 | 7 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Unknown2+ TD | — | — | 2 | 20 | 10 | 10 | 2 | 17 |
| Sat 9/8 | @ Northwestern | W 21-7 | — | 2 | 13 | 6.5 | 6.50 | 1 | 7 |
| Fri 8/31 | vs Army | W 34-14 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 0 | 8 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Duke
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Duke | 5 | 33.3 | 3.6 | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Duke | 0 | — | — | -5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Duke | 157 | 57.6 | 9.9 | 157 |
| 2017 Postseason | Duke | 154 | 54.8 | 7.5 | -3 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Duke | 154 | 54.8 | 7.5 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Duke | 115 | 45.3 | 7.4 | -39 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Duke | 115 | 45.3 | 7.4 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Georgia Tech
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
51
Primary metric
51 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Virginia
44
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
44 receiving yards with a 97.8 efficiency score.
#3
North Carolina
31
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
31 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Virginia Tech
23
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
23 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Northern Illinois
35
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
35 receiving yards with a 58.3 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2016 Regular Season · Duke
157 primary output · 57.6 efficiency · 9.9 usage
57
#2
2017 Postseason · Duke
49.8
154 primary · 54.8 efficiency · 7.5 usage
#3
2017 Regular Season · Duke
49.8
154 primary · 54.8 efficiency · 7.5 usage
Milestones
0
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
1
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8111
Hart · Newhall, CA
- Committed To
- Duke
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
431
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.