Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
West Virginia paired 3,791 primary output with 63.6 efficiency.
Player Stats
Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.
Stat Footprint
Season Ledger
| Season | Team | Games | Total Offense | Pass Yds | Rush Yds | TD | Overall |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | West Virginia | 4 | 379 | 346 | 33 | 3 | 49.4 |
| 2014 Regular Season | West Virginia | 4 | 590 | 483 | 107 | 5 | 49.4 |
| 2015 Postseason | West Virginia | 13 | 555 | 532 | 23 | 5 | 72.3 |
| 2015 Regular Season | West Virginia | 13 | 3,092 | 2,613 | 479 | 27 | 72.3 |
| 2016 Postseason | West Virginia | 13 | 197 | 134 | 63 | 1 | 75.6 |
| 2016 Regular Season | West Virginia | 13 | 3,594 | 3,194 | 400 | 35 | 75.6 |
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2016 Postseason
West Virginia paired 3,791 primary output with 63.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
pass-led usage with 63.6 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas Tech
Win with balanced pass-rush production and strong creator value. It landed in the 92.3th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Primary Metric / G
291.6
Efficiency
63.6
Usage
25.3
Consistency
82.5
Best Game by takeover score
Texas Tech
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Miami: 197. Missouri: 288. Youngstown State: 439. BYU: 359. Kansas State: 292. Texas Tech: 407. TCU: 236. Oklahoma State: 195. Kansas: 324. Texas: 296. Oklahoma: 243. Iowa State: 378. Baylor: 137
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Miami: 47 by 59.6. Missouri: 42 by 66.1. Youngstown State: 41 by 77.3. BYU: 51 by 65.3. Kansas State: 47 by 52.3. Texas Tech: 43 by 81.8. TCU: 39 by 64.1. Oklahoma State: 47 by 46.6. Kansas: 38 by 74.4. Texas: 44 by 54.9. Oklahoma: 39 by 58. Iowa State: 30 by 77.6. Baylor: 38 by 48.9
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Next best actions
Move from the player story into the game log, career arc, team context, and video shelf.