Player Stats

L.J. Collier College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
70
TFL
15.5
Sacks
11.5
QB hurries
7
Passes defended
4

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonTCU00-0--0-
2015 Regular SeasonTCU00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonTCU12211--026.4
2016 Regular SeasonTCU12193.53.5--026.4
2017 PostseasonTCU8311--042.6
2017 Regular SeasonTCU8122.522-042.6
2018 PostseasonTCU10421--071.2
2018 Regular SeasonTCU10305.5354071.2

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

TCU paired 20.5 primary output with 34.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 34.7 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Texas

Loss with 4.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · TCU

Games

10

Havoc Plays / G

2.0

Efficiency

34.7

Usage

10.8

Consistency

60.3

Best Game by takeover score

Texas

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. California: 3. Ohio State: 0. Texas: 4.5. Iowa State: 0. Texas Tech: 4. Oklahoma: 2. Kansas: 1. West Virginia: 3. Baylor: 0. Oklahoma State: 3

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. California: 4 by 46.7. Ohio State: 1 by 4.2. Texas: 4 by 61.7. Iowa State: 5 by 20.8. Texas Tech: 3 by 52.5. Oklahoma: 2 by 28.3. Kansas: 2 by 18.3. West Virginia: 6 by 55. Baylor: 2 by 8.3. Oklahoma State: 5 by 50.8

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.5 · Games = 4 · -0.9 vs Losses
Losses2.4 · Games = 6 · +0.9 vs Wins