Usage Score
6.1
Player Dossier
2014-2017TCU
Nick Orr
S • 5'10" • 187 lbs • DeSoto, TX, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Nick Orr shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28 disruption score.
Efficiency
28
Consistency
51.3
Season Value
24.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · TCU
141516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- TCU
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: SMU
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nick Orr, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season · TCU. Nick Orr shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 28 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2014 Regular Season
TCU paired 1 primary output with 20 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 28 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Texas
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · TCU
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.8
Efficiency
28
Usage
6.1
Consistency
51.3
Best Game by takeover score
Stanford
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Stanford: 1. Unknown: 2. Arkansas: 0. SMU: 0. Oklahoma State: 1. West Virginia: 1. Kansas State: 0. Kansas: 1. Iowa State: 0. Texas: 4. Texas Tech: 1. Baylor: 0. Oklahoma: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Stanford: 3 by 22.5. Unknown: 5 by 40.8. Arkansas: 3 by 12.5. SMU: 8 by 33.3. Oklahoma State: 6 by 35. West Virginia: 9 by 47.5. Kansas State: 4 by 16.7. Kansas: 4 by 26.7. Iowa State: 4 by 16.7. Texas: 3 by 52.5. Texas Tech: 5 by 30.8. Baylor: 3 by 12.5. Oklahoma: 4 by 16.7
Split Comparison
Wins0.9 · n=10 · +0.9 vs Losses
Losses0 · n=2 · -0.9 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · n=7 · -0.3 vs Second Half
Second Half1 · n=6 · +0.3 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Texas
Best efficiency game
52.5 vs Texas
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fri 12/29 | vs Stanford | W 39-37 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 12/2 | @ Oklahoma | L 17-41 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 11/24 | vs Baylor | W 45-22 | 3 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Texas Tech | W 27-3 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/4 | vs Texas | W 24-7 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 4 | — | — |
| Sat 10/28 | @ Iowa State | L 7-14 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 10/22 | vs Kansas | W 43-0 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Kansas State | W 26-6 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/7 | vs West Virginia | W 31-24 | 9 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Oklahoma State | W 44-31 | 6 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/16 | vs SMU | W 56-36 | 8 | 6 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Arkansas | W 28-7 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/3 | vs UnknownSplash game | — | 5 | 3 | — | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
TCU
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | TCU | 1 | 20 | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | TCU | 1 | 20 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | TCU | 11 | 36 | 5.6 | 10 |
| 2016 Regular Season | TCU | 11 | 36 | 5.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | TCU | 11 | 28 | 6.1 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | TCU | 11 | 28 | 6.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
SMU
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1
Primary metric
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#2
Baylor
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Texas
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 51.7 takeover score.
#4
Kansas
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 49.7 takeover score.
#5
SMU
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 44.6 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2014 Regular Season · TCU
1 primary output · 20 efficiency · — usage
40.4
#2
2015 Regular Season · TCU
40.4
1 primary · 20 efficiency · — usage
#3
2016 Postseason · TCU
29.6
11 primary · 36 efficiency · 5.6 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
2
Splash games
3
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.8685
St. John Bosco · Bellflower, CA
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
147
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 28 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.