Usage Score
3
Player Dossier
2014-2018Oklahoma
Carson Meier
FB • 6'5" • 254 lbs • Tulsa, OK, USA
Explosive all-purpose backBig-play efficiency
Carson Meier leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 92.8 efficiency.
Efficiency
92.8
Consistency
67.2
Season Value
65.7
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Oklahoma
141516171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Carson Meier, FB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Oklahoma. Carson Meier leans explosive all-purpose back traits and 92.8 efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 327 primary output with 92.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
backfield-heavy usage with 92.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Alabama
Loss with 51 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
11
Scrimmage Yards / G
29.7
Efficiency
92.8
Usage
3
Consistency
67.2
Best Game by takeover score
Alabama
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Alabama: 51. Iowa State: 32. Army: 11. Texas: 18. TCU: 17. Kansas State: 16. Texas Tech: 35. Oklahoma State: 45. Kansas: 49. West Virginia: 46. Texas: 7
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Alabama: 3 by 100. Iowa State: 1 by 100. Army: 1 by 91.7. Texas: 1 by 100. TCU: 2 by 70.8. Kansas State: 1 by 100. Texas Tech: 2 by 100. Oklahoma State: 2 by 100. Kansas: 3 by 100. West Virginia: 2 by 100. Texas: 1 by 58.3
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins28.7 · Games = 9 · -5.8 vs Losses
Losses34.5 · Games = 2 · +5.8 vs Wins
First Half24.2 · Games = 6 · -12.2 vs Second Half
Second Half36.4 · Games = 5 · +12.2 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
11 games
Featured metric
Scrimmage Yards
Top game by takeover score
Alabama
Best efficiency game
100 vs Alabama
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/30 | @ Alabama | L 34-45 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 51 | 17 |
| Sat 12/1 | vs Texas | W 39-27 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 7 | 7 |
| Sat 11/24 | @ West Virginia | W 59-56 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 46 | 23 |
| Sun 11/18 | vs Kansas | W 55-40 | — | — | — | — | 3 | 49 | 16.3 |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Oklahoma State | W 48-47 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 45 | 22.5 |
| Sun 11/4 | @ Texas Tech | W 51-46 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 35 | 17.5 |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Kansas State | W 51-14 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 16 | 16 |
| Sat 10/20 | @ TCU | W 52-27 | — | — | — | — | 2 | 17 | 8.5 |
| Sat 10/6 | vs Texas | L 45-48 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 18 | 18 |
| Sat 9/22 | vs Army | W 28-21 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 11 | 11 |
| Sat 9/15 | @ Iowa State | W 37-27 | — | — | — | — | 1 | 32 | 32 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 0 | — | 0 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Oklahoma | 327 | 92.8 | 3 | 327 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 327 | 92.8 | 3 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Alabama
Loss with 51 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
51
Primary metric
51 scrimmage yards and 5.9 usage.
#2
Kansas
49
Primary metric
Win with 49 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
49 scrimmage yards and 4.9 usage.
#3
West Virginia
46
Primary metric
Win with 46 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
46 scrimmage yards and 3.4 usage.
#4
Oklahoma State
45
Primary metric
Win with 45 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
45 scrimmage yards and 2.9 usage.
#5
Texas Tech
35
Primary metric
Win with 35 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value.
35 scrimmage yards and 3.2 usage.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2018 Postseason · Oklahoma
327 primary output · 92.8 efficiency · 3 usage
65.7
#2
2018 Regular Season · Oklahoma
65.7
327 primary · 92.8 efficiency · 3 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Oklahoma
50
0 primary · — efficiency · 0 usage
Milestones
0
100+ rush yards
0
150+ scrimmage yards
0
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8536
Union · Tulsa, OK
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
327
Career Scrimmage Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 13 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.