Usage Score
21.2
Player Dossier
2014-2017Oklahoma
Mark Andrews
TE • 6'5" • 254 lbs • Scottsdale, AZ, USA
Vertical playmakerExplosive finisher
Mark Andrews reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
86.3
Consistency
70.8
Season Value
69.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Oklahoma
14151516161717
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 7
- Program Path
- Oklahoma
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Mark Andrews, TE. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason · Oklahoma. Mark Andrews reads as a vertical playmaker based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason
Oklahoma paired 958 primary output with 86.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2017 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 86.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2017 Postseason · Oklahoma
Games
14
Receiving Yards / G
68.4
Efficiency
86.3
Usage
21.2
Consistency
70.8
Best Game by takeover score
Georgia
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
1234567891011121314
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Georgia: 52. UTEP: 134. Ohio State: 23. Tulane: 76. Baylor: 72. Iowa State: 50. Texas: 104. Kansas State: 61. Texas Tech: 79. Oklahoma State: 102. TCU: 44. Kansas: 42. West Virginia: 61. TCU: 58
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Georgia: 4 by 86.7. UTEP: 7 by 100. Ohio State: 2 by 76.7. Tulane: 4 by 100. Baylor: 3 by 100. Iowa State: 3 by 100. Texas: 4 by 100. Kansas State: 7 by 58.1. Texas Tech: 6 by 87.8. Oklahoma State: 3 by 100. TCU: 4 by 73.3. Kansas: 4 by 70. West Virginia: 4 by 100. TCU: 7 by 55.2
Split Comparison
Wins71.3 · n=12 · +20.3 vs Losses
Losses51 · n=2 · -20.3 vs Wins
First Half73 · n=7 · +9.1 vs Second Half
Second Half63.9 · n=7 · -9.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
14 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
UTEP
Best efficiency game
100 vs West Virginia
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/1 | vs Georgia | L 48-54 | — | 4 | 52 | 13 | 13 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 12/2 | vs TCU2+ TD | W 41-17 | — | 7 | 58 | 8.3 | 8.30 | 2 | 17 |
| Sat 11/25 | vs West Virginia | W 59-31 | — | 4 | 61 | 15.3 | 15.30 | 1 | 24 |
| Sat 11/18 | @ Kansas | W 41-3 | — | 4 | 42 | 10.5 | 10.50 | 1 | 24 |
| Sun 11/12 | vs TCU | W 38-20 | — | 4 | 44 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 21 |
| Sat 11/4 | @ Oklahoma State100 receiving yards | W 62-52 | — | 3 | 102 | 34 | 34 | 0 | 55 |
| Sun 10/29 | vs Texas Tech | W 49-27 | — | 6 | 79 | 13.2 | 13.20 | 1 | 18 |
| Sat 10/21 | @ Kansas State | W 42-35 | — | 7 | 61 | 8.7 | 8.70 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 10/14 | @ Texas100 receiving yards | W 29-24 | — | 4 | 104 | 26 | 26 | 1 | 59 |
| Sat 10/7 | vs Iowa State | L 31-38 | — | 3 | 50 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 0 | 26 |
| Sat 9/23 | @ Baylor | W 49-41 | — | 3 | 72 | 24 | 24 | 1 | 28 |
| Sat 9/16 | vs Tulane | W 56-14 | — | 4 | 76 | 19 | 19 | 0 | 29 |
| Sat 9/9 | @ Ohio State | W 31-16 | — | 2 | 23 | 11.5 | 11.50 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 9/2 | vs UTEP100 receiving yards | W 56-7 | — | 7 | 134 | 19.1 | 19.10 | 1 | 45 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Oklahoma
2014-2017
Opening stop
Season Progression
2014201520152016201620172017
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Postseason | Oklahoma | 318 | 83.5 | 8.4 | 318 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 318 | 83.5 | 8.4 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Oklahoma | 489 | 78.6 | 12.4 | 171 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 489 | 78.6 | 12.4 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Oklahoma | 958 | 86.3 | 21.2 | 469 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Oklahoma | 958 | 86.3 | 21.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
UTEP
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
134
Primary metric
134 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Houston
94
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
94 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Tulsa
87
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
87 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Texas
104
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
104 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Oklahoma State
102
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
102 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Postseason · Oklahoma
958 primary output · 86.3 efficiency · 21.2 usage
69.6
#2
2017 Regular Season · Oklahoma
69.6
958 primary · 86.3 efficiency · 21.2 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Oklahoma
51.3
489 primary · 78.6 efficiency · 12.4 usage
Milestones
3
100+ receiving yards
0
8+ catch outings
3
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9407
Desert Mountain · Scottsdale, AZ
- Committed To
- Oklahoma
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
7
Seasons tracked
1,765
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 7 tracked seasons, 35 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.