Player Stats

D.J. Knox College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Scrimmage yards
2,370
Rushing yards
1,853
Receiving yards
517
Touchdowns
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesScrimmageRush YdsRec YdsTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonPurdue00000-
2015 Regular SeasonPurdue10598409189256
2016 Regular SeasonPurdue00000-
2017 PostseasonPurdue1313710136155.4
2017 Regular SeasonPurdue13572460112355.4
2018 PostseasonPurdue1315150072.3
2018 Regular SeasonPurdue131,048868180972.3

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Purdue paired 1,063 primary output with 55.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

backfield-heavy usage with 55.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Ohio State

Win with 154 yards from scrimmage and efficient touch value. It landed in the 84.6th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Purdue

Games

13

Scrimmage Yards / G

81.8

Efficiency

55.4

Usage

25

Consistency

62.5

Best Game by takeover score

Ohio State

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Auburn: 15. Northwestern: 76. Eastern Michigan: 156. Missouri: 29. Boston College: 51. Nebraska: 108. Illinois: 165. Ohio State: 154. Michigan State: 83. Iowa: 54. Minnesota: 45. Wisconsin: 88. Indiana: 39

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Auburn: 7 by 22.3. Northwestern: 8 by 89.6. Eastern Michigan: 22 by 74.8. Missouri: 9 by 34. Boston College: 20 by 26.6. Nebraska: 17 by 62.7. Illinois: 20 by 84.4. Ohio State: 17 by 87.7. Michigan State: 12 by 74.4. Iowa: 13 by 40.9. Minnesota: 12 by 36.9. Wisconsin: 16 by 45.1. Indiana: 11 by 41

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins95.2 · Games = 6 · +24.9 vs Losses
Losses70.3 · Games = 7 · -24.9 vs Wins