Usage Score
5.5
Player Dossier
2014-2018Penn State
S • 5'11" • 199 lbs • Fairfax, VA, USA
Nick Scott shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.4 disruption score.
Usage Score
5.5
Efficiency
25.4
Consistency
10.3
Season Value
11
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Penn State
Snapshot
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nick Scott, S. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Penn State. Nick Scott shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 25.4 disruption score.
Nick Scott played S for Penn State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Nick Scott recorded 46 passing yards, 133 rushing yards, and 43 receiving yards. His top tracked season came in 2015 with Penn State.
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Penn State paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 25.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: App State
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
Games
13
Havoc Plays / G
0.5
Efficiency
25.4
Usage
5.5
Consistency
10.3
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 0. App State: 3. Pittsburgh: 0. Kent State: 0. Illinois: 0. Ohio State: 0. Michigan State: 0. Indiana: 1. Iowa: 1. Michigan: 0. Wisconsin: 1. Rutgers: 0. Maryland: 0
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 6 by 25. App State: 9 by 67.5. Pittsburgh: 2 by 8.3. Kent State: 4 by 16.7. Illinois: 5 by 20.8. Ohio State: 5 by 20.8. Michigan State: 5 by 20.8. Indiana: 7 by 39.2. Iowa: 5 by 30.8. Michigan: 5 by 20.8. Wisconsin: 5 by 30.8. Rutgers: 6 by 25. Maryland: 1 by 4.2
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
App State
Best efficiency game
67.5 vs App State
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs Kentucky | L 24-27 | 6 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Maryland | W 38-3 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Rutgers | W 20-7 | 6 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Wisconsin | W 22-10 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Michigan | L 7-42 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Iowa | W 30-24 | 5 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Indiana | W 33-28 | 7 | 5 | — | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Michigan State | L 17-21 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Ohio State | L 26-27 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Illinois | W 63-24 | 5 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Kent State | W 63-10 | 4 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Pittsburgh | W 51-6 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs App State | W 45-38 | 9 | 5 | — | 1 | 1 | — | 1 | — | — |
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
Penn State
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Postseason | Penn State | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Penn State | 1 | 5.4 | 0.6 | 1 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Penn State | 1 | 5.4 | 0.6 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Penn State | 1.5 | 12.4 | 2.8 | 0.5 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Penn State | 1.5 | 12.4 | 2.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Penn State | 6 | 25.4 | 5.5 | 4.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Penn State | 6 | 25.4 | 5.5 | 0 |
#1 Featured game
App State
Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
3
Primary metric
3 disruption/tackle impact with 62.1 takeover score.
#2
Rutgers
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 46.9 takeover score.
#3
Michigan State
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 38.2 takeover score.
#4
Pittsburgh
0.5
Primary metric
Win with 0.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
0.5 disruption/tackle impact with 30.1 takeover score.
#5
Indiana
1
Primary metric
Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
1 disruption/tackle impact with 26.6 takeover score.
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Penn State
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2015 Regular Season · Penn State
50
0 primary · 0 efficiency · — usage
#3
2018 Postseason · Penn State
11
6 primary · 25.4 efficiency · 5.5 usage
1
Impact games
0
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Recruit Profile
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8661
Fairfax · Fairfax, VA
Career Facts
1
Career teams
9
Seasons tracked
105
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 9 tracked seasons, 42 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.