Player Dossier

2014-2018

Penn State

Amani Oruwariye

CB • 6'1" • 201 lbs • Tampa, FL, USA

Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile

Amani Oruwariye shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.6 disruption score.

Usage Score

4

Efficiency

27.6

Consistency

46.8

Season Value

27.2

Career Arc

Value trend by season

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Penn State

1415161617171818

Snapshot

Career Teams
1
Seasons Tracked
8
Program Path
Penn State
Peak Game
Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State

Scouting Read

Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.

Amani Oruwariye, CB. Best season Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason · Penn State. Amani Oruwariye shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 27.6 disruption score.

Amani Oruwariye played CB for Penn State. Across 5 tracked seasons, Amani Oruwariye recorded 99 tackles and 2 touchdowns. His top tracked season came in 2018 with Penn State.

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2018 Postseason

Penn State paired 15 primary output with 27.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

2018 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 27.6 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Michigan State

Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2018 Postseason · Penn State

Games

13

Havoc Plays / G

1.2

Efficiency

27.6

Usage

4

Consistency

46.8

Best Game by takeover score

Kentucky

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

12345678910111213

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 0. App State: 1. Pittsburgh: 3. Kent State: 2. Illinois: 0. Ohio State: 0. Michigan State: 4. Indiana: 0. Iowa: 2. Michigan: 0. Wisconsin: 1. Rutgers: 0. Maryland: 2

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 2 by 8.3. App State: 7 by 39.2. Pittsburgh: 3 by 42.5. Kent State: 2 by 28.3. Illinois: 3 by 12.5. Ohio State: 4 by 16.7. Michigan State: 4 by 56.7. Indiana: 9 by 37.5. Iowa: 6 by 45. Michigan: 2 by 8.3. Wisconsin: 4 by 26.7. Rutgers: 1 by 4.2. Maryland: 3 by 32.5

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.2 · Games = 9 · +0.2 vs Losses
Losses1 · Games = 4 · -0.2 vs Wins
First Half1.4 · Games = 7 · +0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half0.8 · Games = 6 · -0.6 vs First Half

Game Log

Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.

13 games

Featured metric

Havoc Plays

Top game by takeover score

Michigan State

Best efficiency game

56.7 vs Michigan State

Result
Tue 1/1vs KentuckyL 24-2722000
Sat 11/24vs MarylandW 38-333101
Sat 11/17@ RutgersW 20-710000
Sat 11/10vs WisconsinW 22-10440010
Sat 11/3@ MichiganL 7-4222000
Sat 10/27vs IowaW 30-2463002
Sat 10/20@ IndianaW 33-2896000
Sat 10/13vs Michigan StateL 17-2144004
Sat 9/29vs Ohio StateL 26-2743000
Sat 9/22@ IllinoisW 63-2431000
Sat 9/15vs Kent StateW 63-1021002
Sun 9/9@ PittsburghW 51-6330012
Sat 9/1vs App StateW 45-38770010

Career Arc

Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.

  1. 1

    Penn State

    2014-2018

    Opening stop

Season Progression

20142015201620162017201720182018
SeasonTeamPrimaryEfficiencyUsageDelta
2014 Regular SeasonPenn State0
2015 Regular SeasonPenn State00
2016 PostseasonPenn State110.61.81
2016 Regular SeasonPenn State110.61.80
2017 PostseasonPenn State717.14.76
2017 Regular SeasonPenn State717.14.70
2018 PostseasonPenn State1527.648
2018 Regular SeasonPenn State1527.640

Signature Performances

Top Games

#1 Featured game

Michigan State

Loss with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

4

Primary metric

4 disruption/tackle impact with 53.1 takeover score.

#2

Akron

2

Primary metric

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 45.8 takeover score.

#3

Northwestern

2

Primary metric

Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

2 disruption/tackle impact with 43.2 takeover score.

#4

Pittsburgh

3

Primary metric

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

3 disruption/tackle impact with 41 takeover score.

#5

Kent State

1

Primary metric

Win with 1 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.

1 disruption/tackle impact with 40.8 takeover score.

Top Seasons

#1 Season by value score

2018 Postseason · Penn State

15 primary output · 27.6 efficiency · 4 usage

27.2

#2

2018 Regular Season · Penn State

27.2

15 primary · 27.6 efficiency · 4 usage

#3

2017 Postseason · Penn State

12.8

7 primary · 17.1 efficiency · 4.7 usage

Milestones

0

Impact games

0

Splash games

0

10+ tackle games

Bio, Recruit, and Data Context

Recruit Profile

3★

Class 2014 · Rating 0.8581

Gaither · Tampa, FL

Committed To
Penn State
Commit Date
Jan 1, 2014

Career Facts

1

Career teams

8

Seasons tracked

99

Career Tackles

Data Context

Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.