Usage Score
28.2
Player Dossier
2014-2016Penn State
Chris Godwin
WR • 6'1" • Middletown, DE, USA
Alpha targetExplosive finisher
Chris Godwin reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Efficiency
85.2
Consistency
59.8
Season Value
68.3
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Penn State
141415151616
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Penn State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: USC
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Chris Godwin, WR. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason · Penn State. Chris Godwin reads as a alpha target based on recent role and receiving efficiency.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Postseason
Penn State paired 1,101 primary output with 90.4 efficiency.
Supporting note
2016 Postseason role shape
target-driven usage with 85.2 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2016 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: USC
Loss with an explosive receiving profile. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2016 Postseason · Penn State
Games
13
Receiving Yards / G
75.5
Efficiency
85.2
Usage
28.2
Consistency
59.8
Best Game by takeover score
USC
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
12345678910111213
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. USC: 187. Kent State: 67. Pittsburgh: 36. Temple: 117. Michigan: 8. Minnesota: 97. Ohio State: 39. Purdue: 58. Iowa: 87. Indiana: 82. Rutgers: 36. Michigan State: 135. Wisconsin: 33
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. USC: 9 by 100. Kent State: 7 by 63.8. Pittsburgh: 4 by 60. Temple: 7 by 100. Michigan: 1 by 53.3. Minnesota: 4 by 100. Ohio State: 2 by 100. Purdue: 5 by 77.3. Iowa: 4 by 100. Indiana: 5 by 100. Rutgers: 3 by 80. Michigan State: 5 by 100. Wisconsin: 3 by 73.3
Split Comparison
Wins75.1 · n=10 · -1.9 vs Losses
Losses77 · n=3 · +1.9 vs Wins
First Half78.7 · n=7 · +6.9 vs Second Half
Second Half71.8 · n=6 · -6.9 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
13 games
Featured metric
Receiving Yards
Top game by takeover score
USC
Best efficiency game
100 vs USC
| Result | |||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mon 1/2 | vs USC100 receiving yards · High volume | L 49-52 | — | 9 | 187 | 20.8 | 20.80 | 2 | 72 |
| Sun 12/4 | vs Wisconsin | W 38-31 | — | 3 | 33 | 11 | 11 | 0 | 14 |
| Sat 11/26 | vs Michigan State100 receiving yards · 2+ TD | W 45-12 | — | 5 | 135 | 27 | 27 | 2 | 59 |
| Sun 11/20 | @ Rutgers | W 39-0 | — | 3 | 36 | 12 | 12 | 0 | 22 |
| Sat 11/12 | @ Indiana2+ TD | W 45-31 | — | 5 | 82 | 16.4 | 16.40 | 2 | 26 |
| Sat 11/5 | vs Iowa | W 41-14 | — | 4 | 87 | 21.8 | 21.80 | 0 | 45 |
| Sat 10/29 | @ Purdue2+ TD | W 62-24 | — | 5 | 58 | 11.6 | 11.60 | 2 | 38 |
| Sun 10/23 | vs Ohio State | W 24-21 | — | 2 | 39 | 17.3 | 19.50 | 1 | 20 |
| Sat 10/1 | vs Minnesota | W 29-26 | — | 4 | 97 | 24.3 | 24.30 | 0 | 36 |
| Sat 9/24 | @ Michigan | L 10-49 | — | 1 | 8 | 8 | 8 | 1 | 8 |
| Sat 9/17 | vs Temple100 receiving yards | W 34-27 | — | 7 | 117 | 16.7 | 16.70 | 1 | 52 |
| Sat 9/10 | @ Pittsburgh | L 39-42 | — | 4 | 36 | 9 | 9 | 0 | 15 |
| Sat 9/3 | vs Kent State | W 33-13 | — | 7 | 67 | 9.6 | 9.60 | 0 | 26 |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Penn State
2014-2016
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420142015201520162016
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Postseason | Penn State | 338 | 77 | 10.4 | — |
| 2014 Regular Season | Penn State | 338 | 77 | 10.4 | 0 |
| 2015 Postseason | Penn State | 1,101 | 90.4 | 33.5 | 763 |
| 2015 Regular Season | Penn State | 1,101 | 90.4 | 33.5 | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Penn State | 982 | 85.2 | 28.2 | -119 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Penn State | 982 | 85.2 | 28.2 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
USC
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
187
Primary metric
187 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#2
Maryland
135
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
135 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#3
Georgia
133
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
133 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#4
Boston College
140
Primary metric
Win with an explosive receiving profile.
140 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
#5
Ohio State
103
Primary metric
Loss with an explosive receiving profile.
103 receiving yards with a 100 efficiency score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Postseason · Penn State
1,101 primary output · 90.4 efficiency · 33.5 usage
74.9
#2
2015 Regular Season · Penn State
74.9
1,101 primary · 90.4 efficiency · 33.5 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Penn State
68.3
982 primary · 85.2 efficiency · 28.2 usage
Milestones
9
100+ receiving yards
3
8+ catch outings
5
2+ TD games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
4★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.9293
Middletown · Middletown, DE
- Committed To
- Penn State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
2,421
Career Receiving Yards
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 39 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.