Usage Score
4.1
Player Dossier
2014-2018Penn State
Koa Farmer
LB • 6'1" • 236 lbs • Lake View Terrace, CA, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Koa Farmer shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.8 disruption score.
Efficiency
21.8
Consistency
11.1
Season Value
11.5
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Penn State
1415161617171818
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 8
- Program Path
- Penn State
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Pittsburgh
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Koa Farmer, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season · Penn State. Koa Farmer shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 21.8 disruption score.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2015 Regular Season
Penn State paired 0 primary output with 0 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Postseason role shape
impact-led usage with 21.8 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value stayed steady
2018 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Rutgers
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Postseason · Penn State
Games
12
Havoc Plays / G
0.4
Efficiency
21.8
Usage
4.1
Consistency
11.1
Best Game by takeover score
Kentucky
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Game-by-Game Trend
123456789101112
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Kentucky: 0. App State: 1. Pittsburgh: 0. Illinois: 0. Ohio State: 0.5. Michigan State: 1. Indiana: 0. Iowa: 0. Michigan: 0. Wisconsin: 0. Rutgers: 2. Maryland: 0
Volume vs Efficiency
Low volume / high quality
High volume / high quality
Low volume / lower quality
High volume / lower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Kentucky: 2 by 8.3. App State: 5 by 30.8. Pittsburgh: 1 by 4.2. Illinois: 3 by 12.5. Ohio State: 8 by 38.3. Michigan State: 6 by 35. Indiana: 7 by 29.2. Iowa: 5 by 20.8. Michigan: 4 by 16.7. Wisconsin: 1 by 4.2. Rutgers: 8 by 53.3. Maryland: 2 by 8.3
Split Comparison
Wins0.4 · n=8 · +0 vs Losses
Losses0.4 · n=4 · +0 vs Wins
First Half0.4 · n=6 · +0.1 vs Second Half
Second Half0.3 · n=6 · -0.1 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
12 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Rutgers
Best efficiency game
53.3 vs Rutgers
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Tue 1/1 | vs Kentucky | L 24-27 | 2 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/24 | vs Maryland | W 38-3 | 2 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ Rutgers | W 20-7 | 8 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | vs Wisconsin | W 22-10 | 1 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | @ Michigan | L 7-42 | 4 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Iowa | W 30-24 | 5 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/20 | @ Indiana | W 33-28 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/13 | vs Michigan State | L 17-21 | 6 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 1 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Ohio State | L 26-27 | 8 | 2 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/22 | @ Illinois | W 63-24 | 3 | 1 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sun 9/9 | @ Pittsburgh | W 51-6 | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/1 | vs App State | W 45-38 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Penn State
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
20142015201620162017201720182018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Penn State | 0 | 0 | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Penn State | 8.5 | 17.2 | 4.3 | 8.5 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Penn State | 8.5 | 17.2 | 4.3 | 0 |
| 2017 Postseason | Penn State | 7.5 | 21.2 | 4.8 | -1 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Penn State | 7.5 | 21.2 | 4.8 | 0 |
| 2018 Postseason | Penn State | 4.5 | 21.8 | 4.1 | -3 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Penn State | 4.5 | 21.8 | 4.1 | 0 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Pittsburgh
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5
Primary metric
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 57.3 takeover score.
#2
Rutgers
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 53.8 takeover score.
#3
Maryland
2.5
Primary metric
Win with 2.5 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2.5 disruption/tackle impact with 52.6 takeover score.
#4
Ohio State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 48.6 takeover score.
#5
Iowa
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 41.7 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2015 Regular Season · Penn State
0 primary output · 0 efficiency · — usage
50
#2
2016 Postseason · Penn State
15.3
8.5 primary · 17.2 efficiency · 4.3 usage
#3
2016 Regular Season · Penn State
15.3
8.5 primary · 17.2 efficiency · 4.3 usage
Milestones
0
Impact games
1
Splash games
0
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2014 · Rating 0.8836
Notre Dame · Sherman Oaks, CA
- Committed To
- Penn State
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2014
Career Facts
1
Career teams
8
Seasons tracked
129
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 8 tracked seasons, 44 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.