Player Stats

Christian Campbell College Stats

Career production, season-by-season totals, and the selected-season workbench are grouped here for stat-first searches.

Stat Footprint

Career production snapshot

Tackles
77
TFL
3.5
Sacks
1
Passes defended
15

Season Ledger

Crawlable season-by-season stats

SeasonTeamGamesTacklesTFLSacksQB HurPDTDOverall
2014 Regular SeasonPenn State10-0--042.3
2015 Regular SeasonPenn State00-0--0-
2016 PostseasonPenn State126-0-1036.1
2016 Regular SeasonPenn State122410-4036.1
2017 PostseasonPenn State124-0--057.1
2017 Regular SeasonPenn State12432.51-10057.1

Player insights

Lead takeaway

Best season by value score: 2017 Postseason

Penn State paired 14.5 primary output with 28.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

2017 Postseason role shape

impact-led usage with 28.4 efficiency.

Supporting note

Career value stayed steady

2017 Regular Season tracked close to the prior stop by season value score.

Supporting note

Peak game by takeover score: Northwestern

Win with 3 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.

Analysis workspace

Season Workbench

Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and compare the statistical profile without scrolling through the full player page.

Season Explorer

Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.

2017 Postseason · Penn State

Games

12

Havoc Plays / G

1.2

Efficiency

28.4

Usage

3.9

Consistency

67.5

Best Game by takeover score

Northwestern

Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.

Active game

Hover over a point

Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.

Game-by-Game Trend

Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.

123456789101112

Chronological game order.

Game by game trend chart. Washington: 0. Akron: 1.5. Pittsburgh: 2. Georgia State: 1. Iowa: 1. Indiana: 1.5. Northwestern: 3. Michigan: 2. Ohio State: 0. Michigan State: 1.5. Nebraska: 1. Maryland: 0

Volume vs Efficiency

Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.

Low volumeHigh quality

High volumeHigh quality

Low volumeLower quality

High volumeLower quality

Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.

Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Washington: 4 by 16.7. Akron: 2 by 23.3. Pittsburgh: 4 by 36.7. Georgia State: 2 by 18.3. Iowa: 3 by 22.5. Indiana: 6 by 40. Northwestern: 4 by 46.7. Michigan: 4 by 36.7. Ohio State: 6 by 25. Michigan State: 4 by 31.7. Nebraska: 4 by 26.7. Maryland: 4 by 16.7

Split Comparison

Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.

Wins1.3 · Games = 10 · +0.6 vs Losses
Losses0.8 · Games = 2 · -0.6 vs Wins