Usage Score
10.1
Player Dossier
2014-2018Northwestern
Nate Hall
LB • 6'2" • 231 lbs • Toledo, OH, USA
Ball-hunting defenderSplash play profile
Nate Hall shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.1 disruption score.
Efficiency
33.1
Consistency
64.7
Season Value
29.6
Career Arc
Value trend by season
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Northwestern
141516161718
Snapshot
- Career Teams
- 1
- Seasons Tracked
- 6
- Program Path
- Northwestern
- Peak Game
- Peak game by takeover score: Minnesota
Scouting Read
Best season and peak-game context are pinned here so the rest of the page can stay analytical without losing the headline story.
Nate Hall, LB. Best season Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season · Northwestern. Nate Hall shows a ball-hunting defender profile with 33.1 disruption score.
Nate Hall played LB for Northwestern. Across 5 tracked seasons, Nate Hall recorded 205 tackles. His top tracked season came in 2017 with Northwestern.
Player insights
Lead takeaway
Best season by value score: 2017 Regular Season
Northwestern paired 30.5 primary output with 52.3 efficiency.
Supporting note
2018 Regular Season role shape
impact-led usage with 33.1 efficiency.
Supporting note
Career value cooled off
2018 Regular Season fell back from the prior stop by season value score.
Supporting note
Peak game by takeover score: Purdue
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet. It landed in the 100th percentile of the selected season.
Analysis workspace
Season Workbench
Filter the strongest season sample, inspect game-level shape, and then drop into the full log without losing the story of the year.
Season Explorer
Understand the selected season before dropping into the full game log.
2018 Regular Season · Northwestern
Games
9
Havoc Plays / G
0.9
Efficiency
33.1
Usage
10.1
Consistency
64.7
Best Game by takeover score
Ohio State
Hover a point or expand a game row to keep the active game context visible here.
Active game
Hover over a point
Hover or select a game to keep its context visible here without the page shifting around.
Game-by-Game Trend
Follow how the selected stat changes from one game to the next. Spikes mark standout outings, while dips show quieter weeks.
Chronological game order.
Game by game trend chart. Purdue: 2. Duke: 0. Akron: 0. Michigan: 0.5. Wisconsin: 1. Notre Dame: 1. Iowa: 1. Minnesota: 2. Ohio State: 1
Volume vs Efficiency
Each dot is a game. Farther right means the player carried more of the workload, and higher means they were more efficient with those chances.
Low volumeHigh quality
High volumeHigh quality
Low volumeLower quality
High volumeLower quality
Volume on the x-axis, quality on the y-axis.
Volume versus efficiency scatter chart. Purdue: 10 by 61.7. Duke: 7 by 29.2. Akron: 4 by 16.7. Michigan: 5 by 25.8. Wisconsin: 2 by 18.3. Notre Dame: 9 by 47.5. Iowa: 4 by 26.7. Minnesota: 5 by 40.8. Ohio State: 5 by 30.8
Split Comparison
Compare how this player performed across different situations. "Games" shows how many matchups are included in each split.
Wins1.5 · Games = 4 · +1 vs Losses
Losses0.5 · Games = 5 · -1 vs Wins
First Half0.7 · Games = 5 · -0.6 vs Second Half
Second Half1.3 · Games = 4 · +0.6 vs First Half
Game Log
Dense stat lines with inline explanations and season-linked highlights.
9 games
Featured metric
Havoc Plays
Top game by takeover score
Purdue
Best efficiency game
61.7 vs Purdue
| Result | |||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sun 12/2 | @ Ohio State | L 24-45 | 5 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/17 | @ MinnesotaSplash game | W 24-14 | 5 | 3 | — | 0 | 0 | 2 | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/10 | @ Iowa | W 14-10 | 4 | 3 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 11/3 | vs Notre Dame | L 21-31 | 9 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 10/27 | vs Wisconsin | W 31-17 | 2 | 2 | — | 1 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/29 | vs Michigan | L 17-20 | 5 | 1 | — | 0.50 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/15 | vs Akron | L 34-39 | 4 | 2 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Sat 9/8 | vs Duke | L 7-21 | 7 | 4 | — | 0 | 0 | — | 0 | — | — |
| Fri 8/31 | @ Purdue10+ tackles · Splash game | W 31-27 | 10 | 7 | — | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | — | — |
Career Arc
Track team changes, role shifts, and season-to-season movement.
- 1
Northwestern
2014-2018
Opening stop
Season Progression
201420152016201620172018
| Season | Team | Primary | Efficiency | Usage | Delta |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | — |
| 2015 Regular Season | Northwestern | 0 | — | — | 0 |
| 2016 Postseason | Northwestern | 8 | 29.6 | 7 | 8 |
| 2016 Regular Season | Northwestern | 8 | 29.6 | 7 | 0 |
| 2017 Regular Season | Northwestern | 30.5 | 52.3 | 13.8 | 22.5 |
| 2018 Regular Season | Northwestern | 8.5 | 33.1 | 10.1 | -22 |
Signature Performances
Top Games
#1 Featured game
Minnesota
Win with backfield disruption leading the way.
6.5
Primary metric
6.5 disruption/tackle impact with 68.5 takeover score.
#2
Purdue
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 60 takeover score.
#3
Maryland
4
Primary metric
Win with 4 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
4 disruption/tackle impact with 57.3 takeover score.
#4
Ohio State
2
Primary metric
Loss with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 54.6 takeover score.
#5
Minnesota
2
Primary metric
Win with 2 impact plays across the defensive snap sheet.
2 disruption/tackle impact with 51.2 takeover score.
Top Seasons
#1 Season by value score
2017 Regular Season · Northwestern
30.5 primary output · 52.3 efficiency · 13.8 usage
41.5
#2
2018 Regular Season · Northwestern
29.6
8.5 primary · 33.1 efficiency · 10.1 usage
#3
2016 Postseason · Northwestern
22.8
8 primary · 29.6 efficiency · 7 usage
Milestones
2
Impact games
8
Splash games
2
10+ tackle games
Bio, Recruit, and Data Context
Recruit Profile
3★
Class 2022 · Rating 0.86
Foundation Academy · Winter Garden, FL
- Committed To
- —
- Commit Date
- Jan 1, 2022
Career Facts
1
Career teams
6
Seasons tracked
205
Career Tackles
Data Context
Coverage spans 6 tracked seasons, 34 games, and base opponent context only. Derived metrics fall back to raw production when share or rating context is missing.